Received: by 2002:ab2:1347:0:b0:1f4:ac9d:b246 with SMTP id g7csp314881lqg; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 04:03:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCX4H2Htli3HFAD30l8H/m+f2NpgurhE6vrSpgdsjgWB/jqdh5h3pxKJkfIpRa/T9NUfOlYnuQZdMxJEzXOcLuTJnusGAM74SMhBntrTGQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF6ufenm9MSLjVh3MxXnOH5yVrLiyBWS4UqSHqgx559aBR9eQ6OzL2H0CQBeRhLZNRObFg6 X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:38b:b0:a51:80d9:56de with SMTP id ss11-20020a170907038b00b00a5180d956demr3025096ejb.5.1712833435969; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 04:03:55 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:4601:e00::3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s17-20020a1709066c9100b00a51e43bcb38si613430ejr.509.2024.04.11.04.03.55 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 11 Apr 2024 04:03:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-140291-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=ZiIxGAsq; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-140291-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-140291-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1460C1F27EB6 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:56:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A718D146D49; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZiIxGAsq" Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D54F9146A70 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712832970; cv=none; b=irS9cDkT/2ciGIlnnyOHxs5t23c9EesNpmw0KHVsX9fphG7sVl/ZrIpEyXg7pqqprusE8mbpXpAFMOs5sLVv3V4G28iki0qeEKOIfEg57y6+er0pTUOrsNs3rxrOFzhEwBAXVPGefsKn8udUrHq4rQwJALps+tGHWcfTku6wgm8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712832970; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1OtbrOxLVvaVQ7yBCqWo4EV6mpg+GvWT44z8ZTojnuI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dN+j1SkrOtvDBesVXJTG9tAr7Jy07YnHJxXWcB4vujbDqN5HcTlxShJ0PnGaSF0uPd92qpakCCo8GT9Xh9VtpNXaWEl7zI47hGvf6PCQUUVyicedhPEdemex3R9MX19kva8jZ58qGyd+CyRNqR61Fvz+fTr0F9AT95MqjfGIzpk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZiIxGAsq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BBE9DC433F1; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:56:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1712832970; bh=1OtbrOxLVvaVQ7yBCqWo4EV6mpg+GvWT44z8ZTojnuI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZiIxGAsqnUbHwSgidgbQlc22Yrc2G9WBsP1Q1A8326OjDWEfqEKwsk2Y980lCfJuk 6FIzcRtnT2NrjoHK/Kb0Eopew1TbouNET6qX4Raz6yXt4J+6kBRDxU58s9AlMk8vGr rT/jZYL7D27p65cxsIKtKEzX5mYUs8/9wA3o3ow6eagp2o/w41MnEhYa+1Ecvvv/BP szuPnINDV3tyv4HICBTatWmB8gsX3clNvLEN2cidOYN5v5jDMFU9tR8+306ySUxMfo AkNRB+pS2OCem0H/5RYMSbbqjIPXyiSO6LUP/N6SXakNhsw1WtecoZNUuBnMLAa67K FhYjUU76fT3tw== Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:56:07 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] mfd: kempld: A few cleanups Message-ID: <20240411105607.GE1980182@google.com> References: <20240223195113.880121-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20240411092928.GB1980182@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Thu, 11 Apr 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:29:28AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 02 Apr 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 09:49:49PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > Just a set of ad-hoc cleanups. No functional change intended. > > > > > > Any comments? > > > > > > (I assume the 6+ weeks in the mailing list is enough for all kind of CIs > > > to complain. But they hadn't AFAICS.) > > > > Not sure why these were dropped from my queue. > > > > Likely another Mutt "feature". > > Hmm... Using mutt as well, but probably not in advanced way. I use: I flag-message toggle a message's 'important' flag .. to mark messages as requiring review. Sometimes Mutt drops them for seemingly no reason. It's also not uncommon for me to fetch new mail or open Mutt to find 300 unread mails which I've already parsed. When that happens, all of the mails that I've previously flagged have also been (not so) helpfully unflagged! It's just something that I've grown accustomed to. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]