Received: by 2002:ab2:1347:0:b0:1f4:ac9d:b246 with SMTP id g7csp328773lqg; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 04:32:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCX86HWcCZ7WnukARUQrN3HFw1TQE742ILAa0O+xGYTpm1OMELiRCVD+/HH7t5VCqqHYDJb23M1TmVVpwNq+enbH3JZoNSimKee1RWfbMg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFKX/eE/4tEofhau2AVlgxa25f6HJfhcXj4bgJYS5btWmsRj4gPFkw9YkSZyNUWtMc1HoDj X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:280e:b0:1e5:1041:7ed4 with SMTP id kp14-20020a170903280e00b001e510417ed4mr2739339plb.14.1712835164968; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 04:32:44 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from sy.mirrors.kernel.org (sy.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b6-20020a170903228600b001e2085b3e64si1104059plh.200.2024.04.11.04.32.44 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 11 Apr 2024 04:32:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-140323-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=Qq11f7nu; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-140323-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-140323-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sy.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36597B22646 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE49148300; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Qq11f7nu" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7521E13BACD; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:16:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712834184; cv=none; b=giiuij21oN2nFr8Z68I4poiwO6kS+P5ESUFtSY8vHVMKr7Hcv5mf0d7tQKSUfEgI/qVCUs3QojKqx7WOPHBnmssMmNnIWoLmwqk4v70zY0k/CUthha2H5REf4Z3kyZiGCBlU89lq4KUbX7eB/j0fg5+frUGDK7h8e5lmKYU7uYs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712834184; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EMjB2PkfxOKh9q7sZ971SXpVJUsNb9m2hkWniDsCrtw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZambIofvl5wH0iS2KKFxQWEvmlGABLzvLyQHasXkFmwCfEpQS84cvOHaQ+7by+wSfJa/w145oJ9ldkEgZjpsPHp/WNhJeoDj7+KtCr1v1B85FFQqVQ5ttr2XU6nQtE0BwD6YGo4k+RHVnDYbjFi/rMTwfLyepuQcbdeFGn1Ar2Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Qq11f7nu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1712834183; x=1744370183; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=EMjB2PkfxOKh9q7sZ971SXpVJUsNb9m2hkWniDsCrtw=; b=Qq11f7nub21JM3jAz44rxBrbQbzmjPzA5Frw8fiBhP/YFOfaBj/kldrJ dQW83Ve/tGEh/XZ56vJ6KN7xUXNG1iXs/Mnr3vgCXiw0DiAUm3vXVV00K PaPEEmQu3exgomKbte7m2Gcys47CO5svPa6DMAOFHYN8Witw3RQWEUE8h rBhv01vTlmJ65Go/o1AKxTBvdcDq/zahBmTjwd3Dlf60075C4hfCKmANl zEo/F3M74EyigY6egXeuDKAKlLDRef7BJlYvqV5UGfUgggrW39TzO9y4I mRmkkMs30LDZC2VOmKfPwH0HnmaiwF7QCd1PqSPDGTfUoLgR3TCSpRBnX Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: pIY/55BtTvG2lW7xiGozvg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: PTeUaSOeSgOwos87kB2sKQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11039"; a="30717975" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,193,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="30717975" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Apr 2024 04:16:22 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11039"; a="915460597" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,193,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="915460597" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Apr 2024 04:16:18 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rusPf-00000003KVn-2ah1; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:16:15 +0300 Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:16:15 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= Cc: Jonathan Cameron , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Rob Herring , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Igor Mammedov , Lukas Wunner , Mika Westerberg , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , LKML , linuxarm@huawei.com, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] PCI: Solve two bridge window sizing issues Message-ID: References: <20231228165707.3447-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> <20240409155305.00003022@huawei.com> <76a2504d-f68b-4d39-8aa5-92c5ef3f2ae3@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <76a2504d-f68b-4d39-8aa5-92c5ef3f2ae3@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 01:41:10PM +0300, Ilpo J?rvinen wrote: > On Tue, 9 Apr 2024, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 18:57:00 +0200 > > Ilpo J?rvinen wrote: .. > E.g., there are > zero pci_dbg()s in pci_bus_distribute_available_resources(). So unless the > window is adjusted, we have zero information on what's going on so no > surprise why everyone is "drawing a blank". :-( Perhaps it's a good time to start trace events / points for PCI (if not yet)? Just my 2c. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko