Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-140661-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 15:38:33 +0100
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
	D Scott Phillips OS <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	carl@os.amperecomputing.com, lcherian@marvell.com,
	bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
	Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>, peternewman@google.com,
	dfustini@baylibre.com, amitsinght@marvell.com,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Rex Nie <rex.nie@jaguarmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/31] x86/resctrl: Move the resctrl filesystem code
 to /fs/resctrl
Message-ID: <Zhf16Tg7VtCaplFq@e133380.arm.com>
References: <20240321165106.31602-1-james.morse@arm.com>
 <ed23454e-16df-48e9-a344-a6d8baf902a5@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ed23454e-16df-48e9-a344-a6d8baf902a5@intel.com>

On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 08:13:19PM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi James and x86 Maintainers,
> 
> Please consider the file movements as captured in the diffstat below:
> 
> On 3/21/2024 9:50 AM, James Morse wrote:
> >  MAINTAINERS                               |    2 +
> >  arch/Kconfig                              |    8 +
> >  arch/x86/Kconfig                          |    5 +-
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h            |   45 +-
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/Makefile      |    5 +-
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c        |  119 +-
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c |  506 +--
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h    |  433 +--
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c     |  813 +----
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c | 1126 +-----
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c    | 3929 +-------------------
> >  arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c              |    2 +-
> >  arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c              |    2 +-
> >  fs/Kconfig                                |    1 +
> >  fs/Makefile                               |    1 +
> >  fs/resctrl/Kconfig                        |   23 +
> >  fs/resctrl/Makefile                       |    3 +
> >  fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c                  |  527 +++
> >  fs/resctrl/internal.h                     |  340 ++
> >  fs/resctrl/monitor.c                      |  843 +++++
> >  fs/resctrl/psuedo_lock.c                  | 1122 ++++++
> 
> (sidenote: James, please note typo in psuedo_lock.c)

Noted.

(So that's what the Psuedo Lock key on the keyboard does...)

> 
> >  fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c                     | 4013 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/resctrl.h                   |  153 +-
> >  include/linux/resctrl_types.h             |   98 +
> >  24 files changed, 7244 insertions(+), 6875 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 fs/resctrl/Kconfig
> >  create mode 100644 fs/resctrl/Makefile
> >  create mode 100644 fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
> >  create mode 100644 fs/resctrl/internal.h
> >  create mode 100644 fs/resctrl/monitor.c
> >  create mode 100644 fs/resctrl/psuedo_lock.c
> >  create mode 100644 fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> >  create mode 100644 include/linux/resctrl_types.h
> 
> I would like to check in on the sentiments regarding maintaining the resctrl
> contributions after this work is merged. Considering that resctrl will 
> be split between fs/resctrl and arch/x86, would it still be acceptable for
> resctrl code to both areas (filesystem as well as arch) to flow via the tip tree with
> help from x86 maintainers?
> 
> How will Arm patches flow?
> 
> James, are you planning a separate MAINTAINERS entry for the Arm specific code?
> I would like to propose that you add yourself as a reviewer to the existing resctrl
> MAINTAINERS entry to learn when any changes are submitted that may impact Arm. 
> 
> Reinette

I'll leave this for James to respond.

Cheers
---Dave