Received: by 2002:ab2:7407:0:b0:1f4:b336:87c4 with SMTP id e7csp70154lqn; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:15:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCV8RbQYf0wkyN7vuQUpZULGM0ES3jywqFsGO3KT1HK7/VuRBS7ZsQvjo1MqgckC8axzlCpsvitnOb81GqVKy5y8Z8c09TFA1iFjOqKnpA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGkFpgV9VQKhErTzkdTbBWN+o087mqNnrF9uP7BDJhHT8YpZuhNFJxOlViHhXpF2Sz/9iK8 X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:fa14:b0:2a0:3c31:7d07 with SMTP id cm20-20020a17090afa1400b002a03c317d07mr737376pjb.48.1712870121118; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:15:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1712870121; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IS5p/IBg2UfWIyZTgiMNzZKjX0paaZcfEV8YVEq3zn+81d2NR+MkAC7zr0Y/EBxQSR y0tNEXw4nxREOEOsymkm/Cq7HFJqTvUI8s7u+ldoziK59ByzNM4NVibJldymHuBSuTiJ P4nBg4Bd+x2XnyNoKT6zNjt8G8gIOKpOgYJ9tSO21Hnsz0N4cidjizc/8plvrbM6vP5r gPSJhEMjYwItTWKGNS2puWhINnnpo/uL6nmOJRTdPMxOHC9JRMQsKQvBoUDw1e0UTawa MJj+91abxEGkuxH58Ck00xkI5qnAesdViZUpoClRi33o9LidIvXN/QJDbAStuZbQqYyg sWqQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:date:message-id :dkim-signature; bh=yylrJJTpzBKLsbryev3Q2gs/RGLTJIZuZiKkoe32pE8=; fh=ty5KVHx+SaItzaPlmCautSLGA46yOEr+A6yIwLrMSSE=; b=bDKr0yJs/PQ0jMsQNGIOK0YPaYDXY68sHv5CJflMbB+/FPiy0vv42F+pjH5EHfheK7 oIrNiEY8Uzjuj35N5k1/gEWwawOp4aOZE+dsi2+HENXUWkpDMXmf/qBiaitT3rSxV78X eueiXT+ljPadvwr6ZnJKnP5sKd0bdHzKbf9gonPjAQlq1n3yaRUlzeHJ3GiMm/uakZO5 w2cu7YQGIwbRi/FqUghOh08v212Jx+zLAjCM6FT/ukzt1ExpGwRDltktoUbV4H07Gu4j kZ2b97WYeAsX+DJ2kwWpJWmsViXX05okwSS5xZnRyn5ayNc3OWDQnPezRl60tKAX8yHB lgMw==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=JZ+8cdWY; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=redhat.com dkim=pass dkdomain=redhat.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=redhat.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-141615-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-141615-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45e3:2400::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a24-20020a17090ad81800b002a5202f7b6asi4049110pjv.180.2024.04.11.14.15.20 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:15:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-141615-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=JZ+8cdWY; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=redhat.com dkim=pass dkdomain=redhat.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=redhat.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-141615-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-141615-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C43C9283940 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 21:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D423335DB; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 21:15:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="JZ+8cdWY" Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8F86205E0D for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 21:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712870114; cv=none; b=ar+4vzIMvmXrb0pINkTF3rtaiLwwPN2IGQBtfn+2R2t1SJ7bA8Dkr2x+/oH9fp9aUbApr0NQ0pxU/nAJoxe/7Qp+7zMIbj2kc12xByFSwm2vR0AqxdeTlj7jeKKe8RefEyCusrMwwy21Bcdh42dSIak+ktpD6rfURZfPPGrjFFo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712870114; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hT2KTgjGoVpgVS2aijsAdopXAUGogODnUkUE6fDKj3E=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=iekGbxO/C7xK91D+PgeNAwLJ5up8ODgRlOC+QZm5bB5PBVDmKIsLyCVO8GfslBnHqorOppdmaPOQJKNR2IoPNYVQ6ME9Ad6HFBtZbCP+8Y1QBSOhaPSzOYhGjzbLK0Hirk15OM9AOovNKlshqGf8FcRJIssqyEnLjE7/IdklEJc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=JZ+8cdWY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1712870111; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=yylrJJTpzBKLsbryev3Q2gs/RGLTJIZuZiKkoe32pE8=; b=JZ+8cdWYDujTDwdKlbYtU/lvwePe9Fc4eL6kimPBQa0tSCzoj7INN+SSBoO2+Zky3MeIRJ FCx7yWsvqeU34OUle1rabAeG0p0uQuUPpMyA7sbqsNvzYYBdIEoMGAEdvCnNV+u6eOHccX 66Hdur58TK+wGsubAdviQnQ9zurTn/Q= Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-414-2_mBbR7LNUO7PpVX7xyhOQ-1; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:15:10 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 2_mBbR7LNUO7PpVX7xyhOQ-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-417cf901ab4so1475175e9.1 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:15:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712870109; x=1713474909; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=yylrJJTpzBKLsbryev3Q2gs/RGLTJIZuZiKkoe32pE8=; b=p/PVkBw0KOsRtRBan2lxoiN/lcvBEnKceRFovYi2Or7/CZcigwdn2pJFVgHi+hQ6iA rCCtNJWhCbkpD+EHkukQYiYdPtndmUg3XW/8TPXJBGp43rEGFxtCCXuWwPXTXhCPXfvY uAUJoQO/V8lmWBJlsyvDAazigs5Hku7+mCi3GZcpXDHBIqZOK7vnBfzcx722Y+HpDC39 waEjU8dN7FRSKjlGgS7TKSJTaq6jGkP5tI8J2qWoF+GuQbpMDgR4Ufoa+KavpgidnjUG XMtW0gPZbRvDxYpp2io3ExURih3p8JpjjlwrfKsrjLAtSi9VcLxp7WqUamubeVGnmrUH bCQA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVDWvs3vaCvkHgEvcVp/GF+zAzqRkcmwI7y4Kn+8NrNesoCS0HDiBdr6FH7tjP3D7wiv3eqauJYyFK0RNyHMqn1bnQIYEp33Fcjv2t1 X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwJqygd7EXTJsgiejipH5mayOc0qy6PhX50INT/F95D0BMO3nJO p2z0rGHwqG2vyS+dHZPhYhaAEC+WtkBOUmSbQ5+3KIyWT3RSFwN09q+nqzwv+dItUsFfE/2Rwe+ eFvEeki1LYyIgTE9Ai3n9m/OsrtBt8UpVwQWJ/VxqYOTTYdPpFIZLHZb9I6ufzg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1e1e:b0:417:dc53:69ae with SMTP id ay30-20020a05600c1e1e00b00417dc5369aemr719524wmb.2.1712870109182; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:15:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1e1e:b0:417:dc53:69ae with SMTP id ay30-20020a05600c1e1e00b00417dc5369aemr719507wmb.2.1712870108729; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:15:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c724:4300:430f:1c83:1abc:1d66? (p200300cbc7244300430f1c831abc1d66.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c724:4300:430f:1c83:1abc:1d66]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f10-20020a056000128a00b003436a3cae6dsm2620530wrx.98.2024.04.11.14.15.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:15:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <86722546-1d54-4224-9f31-da4f368cd47e@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 23:15:07 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/rmap: do not add fully unmapped large folio to deferred split list To: Yang Shi Cc: Zi Yan , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , Ryan Roberts , Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20240411153232.169560-1-zi.yan@sent.com> Content-Language: en-US From: David Hildenbrand Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; keydata= xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzSREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT7CwZgEEwEIAEICGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQW AgMBAh4BAheAAhkBFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl8Ox4kFCRKpKXgACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1oHcA//a6Tj7SBNjFNM1iNhWUo1lxAja0lpSodSnB2g4FCZ4R61SBR4l/psBL73xktp rDHrx4aSpwkRP6Epu6mLvhlfjmkRG4OynJ5HG1gfv7RJJfnUdUM1z5kdS8JBrOhMJS2c/gPf wv1TGRq2XdMPnfY2o0CxRqpcLkx4vBODvJGl2mQyJF/gPepdDfcT8/PY9BJ7FL6Hrq1gnAo4 3Iv9qV0JiT2wmZciNyYQhmA1V6dyTRiQ4YAc31zOo2IM+xisPzeSHgw3ONY/XhYvfZ9r7W1l pNQdc2G+o4Di9NPFHQQhDw3YTRR1opJaTlRDzxYxzU6ZnUUBghxt9cwUWTpfCktkMZiPSDGd KgQBjnweV2jw9UOTxjb4LXqDjmSNkjDdQUOU69jGMUXgihvo4zhYcMX8F5gWdRtMR7DzW/YE BgVcyxNkMIXoY1aYj6npHYiNQesQlqjU6azjbH70/SXKM5tNRplgW8TNprMDuntdvV9wNkFs 9TyM02V5aWxFfI42+aivc4KEw69SE9KXwC7FSf5wXzuTot97N9Phj/Z3+jx443jo2NR34XgF 89cct7wJMjOF7bBefo0fPPZQuIma0Zym71cP61OP/i11ahNye6HGKfxGCOcs5wW9kRQEk8P9 M/k2wt3mt/fCQnuP/mWutNPt95w9wSsUyATLmtNrwccz63XOwU0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYCGwwWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3 AP+DWgUCXw7HsgUJEqkpoQAKCRBN3hD3AP+DWrrpD/4qS3dyVRxDcDHIlmguXjC1Q5tZTwNB boaBTPHSy/Nksu0eY7x6HfQJ3xajVH32Ms6t1trDQmPx2iP5+7iDsb7OKAb5eOS8h+BEBDeq 3ecsQDv0fFJOA9ag5O3LLNk+3x3q7e0uo06XMaY7UHS341ozXUUI7wC7iKfoUTv03iO9El5f XpNMx/YrIMduZ2+nd9Di7o5+KIwlb2mAB9sTNHdMrXesX8eBL6T9b+MZJk+mZuPxKNVfEQMQ a5SxUEADIPQTPNvBewdeI80yeOCrN+Zzwy/Mrx9EPeu59Y5vSJOx/z6OUImD/GhX7Xvkt3kq Er5KTrJz3++B6SH9pum9PuoE/k+nntJkNMmQpR4MCBaV/J9gIOPGodDKnjdng+mXliF3Ptu6 3oxc2RCyGzTlxyMwuc2U5Q7KtUNTdDe8T0uE+9b8BLMVQDDfJjqY0VVqSUwImzTDLX9S4g/8 kC4HRcclk8hpyhY2jKGluZO0awwTIMgVEzmTyBphDg/Gx7dZU1Xf8HFuE+UZ5UDHDTnwgv7E th6RC9+WrhDNspZ9fJjKWRbveQgUFCpe1sa77LAw+XFrKmBHXp9ZVIe90RMe2tRL06BGiRZr jPrnvUsUUsjRoRNJjKKA/REq+sAnhkNPPZ/NNMjaZ5b8Tovi8C0tmxiCHaQYqj7G2rgnT0kt WNyWQQ== Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 11.04.24 21:01, Yang Shi wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 8:46 AM David Hildenbrand wrote: >> >> On 11.04.24 17:32, Zi Yan wrote: >>> From: Zi Yan >>> >>> In __folio_remove_rmap(), a large folio is added to deferred split list >>> if any page in a folio loses its final mapping. It is possible that >>> the folio is unmapped fully, but it is unnecessary to add the folio >>> to deferred split list at all. Fix it by checking folio mapcount before >>> adding a folio to deferred split list. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan >>> --- >>> mm/rmap.c | 9 ++++++--- >>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c >>> index 2608c40dffad..d599a772e282 100644 >>> --- a/mm/rmap.c >>> +++ b/mm/rmap.c >>> @@ -1494,7 +1494,7 @@ static __always_inline void __folio_remove_rmap(struct folio *folio, >>> enum rmap_level level) >>> { >>> atomic_t *mapped = &folio->_nr_pages_mapped; >>> - int last, nr = 0, nr_pmdmapped = 0; >>> + int last, nr = 0, nr_pmdmapped = 0, mapcount = 0; >>> enum node_stat_item idx; >>> >>> __folio_rmap_sanity_checks(folio, page, nr_pages, level); >>> @@ -1506,7 +1506,8 @@ static __always_inline void __folio_remove_rmap(struct folio *folio, >>> break; >>> } >>> >>> - atomic_sub(nr_pages, &folio->_large_mapcount); >>> + mapcount = atomic_sub_return(nr_pages, >>> + &folio->_large_mapcount) + 1; >> >> That becomes a new memory barrier on some archs. Rather just re-read it >> below. Re-reading should be fine here. >> >>> do { >>> last = atomic_add_negative(-1, &page->_mapcount); >>> if (last) { >>> @@ -1554,7 +1555,9 @@ static __always_inline void __folio_remove_rmap(struct folio *folio, >>> * is still mapped. >>> */ >>> if (folio_test_large(folio) && folio_test_anon(folio)) >>> - if (level == RMAP_LEVEL_PTE || nr < nr_pmdmapped) >>> + if ((level == RMAP_LEVEL_PTE && >>> + mapcount != 0) || >>> + (level == RMAP_LEVEL_PMD && nr < nr_pmdmapped)) >>> deferred_split_folio(folio); >>> } >> >> But I do wonder if we really care? Usually the folio will simply get >> freed afterwards, where we simply remove it from the list. >> >> If it's pinned, we won't be able to free or reclaim, but it's rather a >> corner case ... >> >> Is it really worth the added code? Not convinced. > > It is actually not only an optimization, but also fixed the broken > thp_deferred_split_page counter in /proc/vmstat. > > The counter actually counted the partially unmapped huge pages (so > they are on deferred split queue), but it counts the fully unmapped > mTHP as well now. For example, when a 64K THP is fully unmapped, the > thp_deferred_split_page is not supposed to get inc'ed, but it does > now. > > The counter is also useful for performance analysis, for example, > whether a workload did a lot of partial unmap or not. So fixing the > counter seems worthy. Zi Yan should have mentioned this in the commit > log. Yes, all that is information that is missing from the patch description. If it's a fix, there should be a "Fixes:". Likely we want to have a folio_large_mapcount() check in the code below. (I yet have to digest the condition where this happens -- can we have an example where we'd use to do the wrong thing and now would do the right thing as well?) -- Cheers, David / dhildenb