Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-141827-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:55:32 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@marvell.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
 <davem@davemloft.net>, <sgoutham@marvell.com>, <gakula@marvell.com>,
 <jerinj@marvell.com>, <lcherian@marvell.com>, <sbhatta@marvell.com>,
 <naveenm@marvell.com>, <edumazet@google.com>, <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PatchV2] octeontx2-af: map management port always to
 first PF
Message-ID: <20240411195532.033e21fb@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20240410132538.20158-1-hkelam@marvell.com>
References: <20240410132538.20158-1-hkelam@marvell.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:55:38 +0530 Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> The user can enable or disable any MAC block or a few ports of the
> block. The management port's interface name varies depending on the
> setup of the user if its not mapped to the first pf.

There is no concept of management port in Linux networking.
I may be missing the point, but I'm unable to review this in 
the context of the upstream Linux kernel.