Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-142022-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:16:08 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Elizabeth Figura <zfigura@codeweavers.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, wine-devel@winehq.org,
	=?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
	Arkadiusz Hiler <ahiler@codeweavers.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/30] ntsync: Introduce NTSYNC_IOC_WAIT_ANY.
Message-ID: <2024041254-that-laurel-30f9@gregkh>
References: <20240329000621.148791-1-zfigura@codeweavers.com>
 <20240329000621.148791-5-zfigura@codeweavers.com>
 <2024041111-handsaw-scruffy-27f3@gregkh>
 <25522541.6Emhk5qWAg@camazotz>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <25522541.6Emhk5qWAg@camazotz>

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 07:33:07PM -0500, Elizabeth Figura wrote:
> > Rolling your own lock is tricky, and needs review from the locking
> > maintainers.  And probably some more documentation as to what is
> > happening and why our normal types of locks can't be used here?
> 
> Definitely. (Unfortunately this hasn't gotten attention from any locking
> maintainer yet since your last call for review; not sure if there's
> anything I can do there.)

You only seem to have cc:ed one of the "LOCKING PRIMITIVES" maintainers
on this patchset, not all of them, which might be the reason why it has
been ignored :(

Perhaps change that for the next version of this patchset?

thanks,

greg k-h