Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-142103-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 09:01:23 +0200
From: Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Nylon Chen <nylon.chen@sifive.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, conor@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, 
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, 
	aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, thierry.reding@gmail.com, vincent.chen@sifive.com, 
	zong.li@sifive.com, nylon7717@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] pwm: sifive: change the PWM algorithm
Message-ID: <l5ymy3rlqdlkwonyxq7xqgxgk5zsgbadui7p4ehl7qeh3m2pef@ic2zyktdqcia>
References: <20240222081231.213406-1-nylon.chen@sifive.com>
 <20240222081231.213406-3-nylon.chen@sifive.com>
 <f5ukvah2ujko2iht3pd5jxq5kaukbs5z3pn5s7qwcnx4aqr3yv@mwtbwkcfa44a>
 <CAHh=Yk8MXy73d8M1J5bVu4spDMbjQDneVTqA=Ts=SGPDO7PXMQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHh=Yk-WmzJe0vb+noX8Gb13BL2SOB=MwSB=F9nH_G-j9zi1Lw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="26vwn4hmygkd27i7"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHh=Yk-WmzJe0vb+noX8Gb13BL2SOB=MwSB=F9nH_G-j9zi1Lw@mail.gmail.com>


--26vwn4hmygkd27i7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 10:07:12AM +0800, Nylon Chen wrote:
> Nylon Chen <nylon.chen@sifive.com> =E6=96=BC 2024=E5=B9=B44=E6=9C=882=E6=
=97=A5 =E9=80=B1=E4=BA=8C =E4=B8=8A=E5=8D=8810:08=E5=AF=AB=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
> > Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> =E6=96=BC 2024=
=E5=B9=B43=E6=9C=8819=E6=97=A5 =E9=80=B1=E4=BA=8C =E4=B8=8A=E5=8D=882:16=E5=
=AF=AB=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
> > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 04:12:30PM +0800, Nylon Chen wrote:
> > > >       /* The hardware cannot generate a 100% duty cycle */
> Do you mean that if the inference is correct, this comment should be modi=
fied?

If the polarity was wrong before and the hardware was believed to not be
able to generate a 100% relative duty cycle, then maybe it's really a 0%
relative duty cycle that's impossible?

Best regards
Uwe

--=20
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6nig         =
   |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

--26vwn4hmygkd27i7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEP4GsaTp6HlmJrf7Tj4D7WH0S/k4FAmYY3EIACgkQj4D7WH0S
/k5rHwgAhpRRZGowKVE0iokFu7iytXC6fdzFLCzGGn8LC2r59oYV4X8E4ruZzGxi
KMljwKutSBOpirgQ7/8usYyYqlOfAO+x6BXkkg3SHBprmGPfq2+iVEGv5Tj95B7j
9t+GueFeOTR6xJRF++3pv88sp4zYLYHIhtRVSU5YZy1Wb8MbRjJfR5kI+dDy5xtF
UqW5uhIzpV54qyNHnwf8dV0pCooMilhcHS/eGiVa+nSTdoon6rlNJWs+YZgUr1Ud
lDiRWzbwQdju5xFUnoR2hGn/FO/6Jgmws9FKkM0ttnkWdgcYvzsBe7gk6qRPQGgr
kw8IV64UfIbDlmpcuiLqeNi7Iq08uA==
=KwIm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--26vwn4hmygkd27i7--