Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-142133-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:25:31 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Colberg <peter.colberg@intel.com>,
	Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>, Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>,
	Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>, Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
	linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Russ Weight <russ.weight@linux.dev>,
	Marco Pagani <marpagan@redhat.com>,
	Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com>,
	Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: intel-m10-bmc: Change staging size to a variable
Message-ID: <20240412072531.GN2399047@google.com>
References: <20240402184925.1065932-1-peter.colberg@intel.com>
 <20240411154956.GH2399047@google.com>
 <ZhieBC124oq/Fcqa@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <ZhieBC124oq/Fcqa@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>

On Fri, 12 Apr 2024, Xu Yilun wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 04:49:56PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 02 Apr 2024, Peter Colberg wrote:
> > 
> > > From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > The secure update driver does a sanity-check of the image size in
> > > comparison to the size of the staging area in FLASH. Instead of
> > > hard-wiring M10BMC_STAGING_SIZE, move the staging size to the
> > > m10bmc_csr_map structure to make the size assignment more flexible.
> > > 
> > > Co-developed-by: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Colberg <peter.colberg@intel.com>
> > 
> > Xu Yilun, Peter,
> > 
> > Do you require a pull-request from an immutable branch for this?
> 
> No need. The patchset could all be applied to mfd branch.

Prefect, thank you.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]