Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-142544-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
From: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
To: tglx@linutronix.de,
	yury.norov@gmail.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	maz@kernel.org,
	florian.fainelli@broadcom.com,
	chenhuacai@kernel.org,
	jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com,
	anup@brainfault.org,
	palmer@dabbelt.com,
	samuel.holland@sifive.com,
	linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] irqchip/sifive-plic: Avoid explicit cpumask allocation on stack
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 18:58:39 +0800
Message-Id: <20240412105839.2896281-7-dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
In-Reply-To: <20240412105839.2896281-1-dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
References: <20240412105839.2896281-1-dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Feedback-ID: bizesmtpsz:shingroup.cn:qybglogicsvrgz:qybglogicsvrgz5a-1

In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as
for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of
stack space and make stack overflows more likely.

Use cpumask_first_and_and() to avoid the need for a temporary cpumask on
the stack.

Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
index f3d4cb9e34f7..bf5d2fc6396e 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
@@ -164,15 +164,13 @@ static int plic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
 			     const struct cpumask *mask_val, bool force)
 {
 	unsigned int cpu;
-	struct cpumask amask;
 	struct plic_priv *priv = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
 
-	cpumask_and(&amask, &priv->lmask, mask_val);
-
 	if (force)
-		cpu = cpumask_first(&amask);
+		cpu = cpumask_first_and(&priv->lmask, mask_val);
 	else
-		cpu = cpumask_any_and(&amask, cpu_online_mask);
+		cpu = cpumask_first_and_and(&priv->lmask, mask_val,
+					    cpu_online_mask);
 
 	if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
 		return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.27.0