Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-142955-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:31:14 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: John Fraker <jfraker@google.com>, 
 netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: John Fraker <jfraker@google.com>, 
 Harshitha Ramamurthy <hramamurthy@google.com>, 
 Shailend Chand <shailend@google.com>, 
 Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>, 
 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, 
 Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@google.com>, 
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, 
 Junfeng Guo <junfeng.guo@intel.com>, 
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <661953c285139_38e2532941f@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
In-Reply-To: <20240412053245.3328123-1-jfraker@google.com>
References: <20240412053245.3328123-1-jfraker@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 12] gve: Correctly report software timestamping
 capabilities
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

John Fraker wrote:
> gve has supported software timestamp generation since its inception,
> but has not advertised that support via ethtool. This patch correctly
> advertises that support.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Fraker <jfraker@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Harshitha Ramamurthy <hramamurthy@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>

> ---
> v2: Used ethtool_op_get_ts_info instead of our own implementation, as
>     suggested by Jakub

FYI: the subject says "net-next 12", not "net-next v2"