Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-143329-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:49:35 +0200
From: Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Provide !COMMON_CLK dummy for
 devm_clk_rate_exclusive_get()
Message-ID: <xfaf22rf6gnrxpinkciybsyk4dx2bfqgozv6udwymegtcgd26i@jq5be7fm5lhi>
References: <202403270305.ydvX9xq1-lkp@intel.com>
 <20240327073310.520950-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
 <d95554f623f023a2f5499fa2f6f76567.sboyd@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tcm26yzrf676zf3u"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d95554f623f023a2f5499fa2f6f76567.sboyd@kernel.org>


--tcm26yzrf676zf3u
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello Stephen,

On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 03:35:57PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig (2024-03-27 00:33:10)
> > To be able to compile drivers using devm_clk_rate_exclusive_get() also
> > on platforms without the common clk framework, add a dummy
> > implementation that does the same as clk_rate_exclusive_get() in that
> > case (i.e. nothing).
> >=20
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403270305.ydvX9xq1-lkp=
@intel.com/
> > Fixes: b0cde62e4c54 ("clk: Add a devm variant of clk_rate_exclusive_get=
()")
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
>=20
> Applied to clk-fixes

I assume that means it will be sent to Linus before 6.9? That would be
great because I want to make use of this function in some drivers and
the build bots nag about my for-next branch that in some configurations
this function is missing.

Thanks
Uwe

--=20
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

--tcm26yzrf676zf3u
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEP4GsaTp6HlmJrf7Tj4D7WH0S/k4FAmYZnl4ACgkQj4D7WH0S
/k4bhAf/dU3dIH1rQHO52ZY4eCb6/UQ6pdDM8CzZxB2oGa60PXugNfbK5LqTCNEB
q5FVGKRHe+lbUG2Dk4belrX3ZNMXweqywtHu0bXbPZZjPjCvrYmCdRJKuHLSQgRV
5gHxyFQshzOr49JHsWieLVj7le4bAHBbgF9r/a2gcWUsS4xOAaNNCzgPb8fR7nzX
pcbXThX4rhn9kP65ZokC2sEJyobMFNCrTewaOXP6UNaSUt/M/qTnsgDhxMa7ywPi
4deahcIXXS5ZKj2ICyz08cNryUnJVA+bhYNvzi7zP51TvNynLcwYfdkF+n5T5Gin
aUgbiu3Sm38THO0Eiw5M+GgIUfYj0A==
=/h7x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tcm26yzrf676zf3u--