Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-143428-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 16:21:11 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>, <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
 <osalvador@suse.de>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/memory-failure: fix deadlock when
 hugetlb_optimize_vmemmap is enabled
Message-Id: <20240412162111.10f67ad0f001734464b53ad8@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <8d186776-f3b1-5d9a-2f94-fa249dee7d5f@huawei.com>
References: <20240412025754.1897615-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
	<48647e5b-d15b-457b-9879-fb1b6bbaee27@oracle.com>
	<8d186776-f3b1-5d9a-2f94-fa249dee7d5f@huawei.com>
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 16:11:52 +0800 Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> wrote:

> > I recently sent a patch[1] to convert dissolve_free_huge_page() to folios which changes the function name and the name referenced in the comment so this will conflict with my patch. It's in mm-unstable now, would you be able to rebase to that in a new version?
> > 

This patch is a hotfixes, cc:stable one so the mm-unstable material will be
based on top of this change.

I've queued this change up as a -fix against v1.  And I've retained
this changelog addition:

: This issue won't occur until commit a6b40850c442 ("mm: hugetlb: replace
: hugetlb_free_vmemmap_enabled with a static_key").  As it introduced
: rlock(cpu_hotplug_lock) in dissolve_free_huge_page() code path while
: lock(pcp_batch_high_lock) is already in the __page_handle_poison().

And I've queued another -fix to reflow that block comment to 80 columns.

--- a/mm/memory-failure.c~mm-memory-failure-fix-deadlock-when-hugetlb_optimize_vmemmap-is-enabled-v2-fix
+++ a/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -155,14 +155,16 @@ static int __page_handle_poison(struct p
 	int ret;
 
 	/*
-	 * zone_pcp_disable() can't be used here. It will hold pcp_batch_high_lock and
-	 * dissolve_free_huge_page() might hold cpu_hotplug_lock via static_key_slow_dec()
-	 * when hugetlb vmemmap optimization is enabled. This will break current lock
-	 * dependency chain and leads to deadlock.
-	 * Disabling pcp before dissolving the page was a deterministic approach because
-	 * we made sure that those pages cannot end up in any PCP list. Draining PCP lists
-	 * expels those pages to the buddy system, but nothing guarantees that those pages
-	 * do not get back to a PCP queue if we need to refill those.
+	 * zone_pcp_disable() can't be used here. It will
+	 * hold pcp_batch_high_lock and dissolve_free_huge_page() might hold
+	 * cpu_hotplug_lock via static_key_slow_dec() when hugetlb vmemmap
+	 * optimization is enabled. This will break current lock dependency
+	 * chain and leads to deadlock.
+	 * Disabling pcp before dissolving the page was a deterministic
+	 * approach because we made sure that those pages cannot end up in any
+	 * PCP list. Draining PCP lists expels those pages to the buddy system,
+	 * but nothing guarantees that those pages do not get back to a PCP
+	 * queue if we need to refill those.
 	 */
 	ret = dissolve_free_huge_page(page);
 	if (!ret) {
_