Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-144113-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 12:56:46 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wei=DFschuh?= <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/nolibc: add support for uname(2)
Message-ID: <20240414105646.GA2236@1wt.eu>
References: <20240414-nolibc-uname-v1-1-28a1fdbd5c64@weissschuh.net>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20240414-nolibc-uname-v1-1-28a1fdbd5c64@weissschuh.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

Hi Thomas!

On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 09:56:23AM +0200, Thomas Wei?schuh wrote:
> All supported kernels are assumed to use struct new_utsname.
> This is validated in test_uname().
> 
> uname(2) can for example be used in ksft_min_kernel_version() from the
> kernels selftest framework.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240412123536.GA32444@redhat.com/

I find it really annoying when other developers waste time trying to
work around some missing trivial syscalls. I would have bet we already
had this one, but obviously not.

That's obviously an ack by me: Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>

Thank you!
Willy