Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-144668-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:26:17 +0800 (CST)
Message-ID: <20240415152617552rmRLJBUV8aJ4lLJILh6-Z@zte.com.cn>
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: <li.hao40@zte.com.cn>
To: <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Cc: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W1BBVENIIHYyXSB0dHk6IGh2Yzogd2FrZXVwIGh2YyBjb25zb2xlIGltbWVkaWF0ZWx5IHdoZW4gbmVlZGVk?=
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="UTF-8"

From: Li Hao <li.hao40@zte.com.cn>

Cancel the do_wakeup flag in hvc_struct, and change it to immediately
wake up tty when hp->n_outbuf is 0 in hvc_push().

When we receive a key input character, the interrupt handling function
hvc_handle_interrupt() will be executed, and the echo thread
flush_to_ldisc() will be added to the queue.

If the user is currently using tcsetattr(), a hang may occur. tcsetattr()
enters kernel and waits for hp->n_outbuf to become 0 via
tty_wait_until_sent(). If the echo thread finishes executing before
reaching tty_wait_until_sent (for example, put_chars() takes too long),
it will cause while meeting the wakeup condition (hp->do_wakeup = 1),
tty_wait_until_sent() cannot be woken up (missed the tty_wakeup() of
this round's tty_poll). Unless the next key input character comes,
hvc_poll will be executed, and tty_wakeup() will be performed through
the do_wakeup flag.

v1->v2:
Some fixes according to:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/75dff5cd-7b0e-4039-9157-8bf10cf7ba29@kernel.org/
    use tty_port_tty_wakeup() instead of tty_wakeup() to wake up tty

Signed-off-by: Li Hao <li.hao40@zte.com.cn>
---
 drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c | 10 +++-------
 drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.h |  1 -
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c
index cd1f657f7..cbd234847 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c
@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ static int hvc_push(struct hvc_struct *hp)
 	n = hp->ops->put_chars(hp->vtermno, hp->outbuf, hp->n_outbuf);
 	if (n <= 0) {
 		if (n == 0 || n == -EAGAIN) {
-			hp->do_wakeup = 1;
+			tty_port_tty_wakeup(&hp->port);
 			return 0;
 		}
 		/* throw away output on error; this happens when
@@ -491,7 +491,7 @@ static int hvc_push(struct hvc_struct *hp)
 	if (hp->n_outbuf > 0)
 		memmove(hp->outbuf, hp->outbuf + n, hp->n_outbuf);
 	else
-		hp->do_wakeup = 1;
+		tty_port_tty_wakeup(&hp->port);

 	return n;
 }
@@ -739,11 +739,7 @@ static int __hvc_poll(struct hvc_struct *hp, bool may_sleep)
 	poll_mask |= HVC_POLL_READ;

  out:
-	/* Wakeup write queue if necessary */
-	if (hp->do_wakeup) {
-		hp->do_wakeup = 0;
-		tty_wakeup(tty);
-	}
+	/* Wakeup in hvc_push */
  bail:
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hp->lock, flags);

diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.h b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.h
index cf4c1af08..6622f71ba 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.h
+++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.h
@@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ struct hvc_struct {
 	struct tty_port port;
 	spinlock_t lock;
 	int index;
-	int do_wakeup;
 	int outbuf_size;
 	int n_outbuf;
 	uint32_t vtermno;
-- 
2.25.1