Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754485AbYAXKPP (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:15:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752863AbYAXKPB (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:15:01 -0500 Received: from fms-01.valinux.co.jp ([210.128.90.1]:55375 "EHLO mail.valinux.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752397AbYAXKPA (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:15:00 -0500 Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:14:56 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20080124.191456.119427875.taka@valinux.co.jp> To: yamamoto@valinux.co.jp Cc: agk@redhat.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@redhat.com Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 0/2] dm-band: The I/O bandwidth controller: Overview From: Hirokazu Takahashi In-Reply-To: <20080124033807.42D7B1E3C0C@siro.lan> References: <20080124.012103.105433865.taka@valinux.co.jp> <20080124033807.42D7B1E3C0C@siro.lan> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.1.52 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1417 Lines: 37 Hi, > > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 09:53:50PM +0900, Ryo Tsuruta wrote: > > > > Dm-band gives bandwidth to each job according to its weight, > > > > which each job can set its own value to. > > > > At this time, a job is a group of processes with the same pid or pgrp or uid. > > > > > > It seems to rely on 'current' to classify bios and doesn't do it until the map > > > function is called, possibly in a different process context, so it won't > > > always identify the original source of the I/O correctly: > > > > Yes, this should be mentioned in the document with the current implementation > > as you pointed out. > > > > By the way, I think once a memory controller of cgroup is introduced, it will > > help to track down which cgroup is the original source. > > do you mean to make this a part of the memory subsystem? I just think if the memory subsystem is in front of us, we don't need to reinvent the wheel. But I don't have a concrete image how the interface between dm-band and the memory subsystem should be designed yet. I'd be appreciate if some of the cgroup developers give some ideas about it. Thanks, Hirokazu Takahashi. > YAMAMOTO Takashi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/