Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-145854-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:58:43 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>,
	Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@redhat.com>,
	Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
	ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	"platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org" <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nitin Joshi1 <njoshi1@lenovo.com>,
	Vishnu Sankar <vsankar@lenovo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Input: Add trackpoint doubletap and system debug
 info keycodes
Message-ID: <Zh2G85df29tPP6OK@google.com>
References: <20240324210817.192033-2-mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
 <ZhR-WPx7dgKxziMb@google.com>
 <f3342c0b-fb31-4323-aede-7fb02192cf44@redhat.com>
 <ZhW3Wbn4YSGFBgfS@google.com>
 <ZhXpZe1Gm5e4xP6r@google.com>
 <92ee5cb2-565e-413c-b968-81393a9211c4@app.fastmail.com>
 <ZhcogDESvZmUPEEf@google.com>
 <91593303-4a6a-49c9-87a0-bb6f72f512a1@app.fastmail.com>
 <Zh2CtKy1NfKfojzS@google.com>
 <484638e2-1565-454b-97f8-4fcc6514a69c@redhat.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <484638e2-1565-454b-97f8-4fcc6514a69c@redhat.com>

On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 09:50:37PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 4/15/24 9:40 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 10:48:10PM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> >>
> >> I have a stronger preference to keep the KEY_DOUBLECLICK - that one seems less controversial as a genuine new input event.
> > 
> > Please see my response to Peter's letter. I think it very much depends
> > on how it will be used (associated with the pointer or standalone as it
> > is now).
> > 
> > For standalone application, recalling your statement that on Win you
> > have this gesture invoke configuration utility I would argue for
> > KEY_CONFIG for it.
> 
> KEY_CONFIG is already generated by Fn + F# on some ThinkPads to launch
> the GNOME/KDE control center/panel and I believe that at least GNOME
> comes with a default binding to map KEY_CONFIG to the control-center.

Not KEY_CONTROLPANEL?

Are there devices that use both Fn+# and the doubleclick? Would it be an
acceptable behavior for the users to have them behave the same?

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry