Message-ID: <4798C456.10602@davidnewall.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 03:31:10 +1030
From: David Newall <davidn@davidnewall.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CC: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, akpm@osdl.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for mm] Remove iBCS support
References: <20080120031153.GB6275@one.firstfloor.org> <4792D221.1010704@davidnewall.com> <20080120051822.GB19784@one.firstfloor.org> <4792DD22.4070902@davidnewall.com> <20080120055544.GB19861@one.firstfloor.org> <4792E8E2.1090307@davidnewall.com> <20080120072922.GA21047@one.firstfloor.org> <4793F775.6090403@davidnewall.com> <20080122111205.GA25090@elte.hu> <4796081A.7060505@davidnewall.com> <20080122154918.GA27006@elte.hu>
In-Reply-To: <20080122154918.GA27006@elte.hu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1057
Lines: 24

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> unfortunately you have not replied to my (rather clear) question. Let me
> repeat the question (which can be clearly seen in the quoted sections 
> above). Andi made this assertion:
>
> |  You seem to be under the illusion that iBCS2 support works currently 
> |  in mainline and that only this patch would break it.
>
> And you claimed that what Andi says is false:
>
> ||  I cannot imagine what brings you to that conclusion.  Suffice to say 
> ||  you are entirely and inexplicably wrong.
>   
> All i did was to ask your proof for why you claim that Andi is wrong - 
>   
I am under no illusion that iBCS2 support works currently in mainline. 
I have said nothing that suggest otherwise.  Please stop wasting
everyone's time, and especially mine, with this wilful failure to
understand.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/