Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754973AbYAXRKZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:10:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752424AbYAXRKF (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:10:05 -0500 Received: from mtagate3.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.136]:25401 "EHLO mtagate3.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752088AbYAXRKD (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:10:03 -0500 Message-ID: <4798C664.1040409@fr.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:09:56 +0100 From: Cedric Le Goater User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pavel Machek CC: Pavel Emelyanov , Linux Containers , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Extend sys_clone and sys_unshare system calls API References: <478DFF8F.9030006@openvz.org> <20080123205930.GA5233@ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20080123205930.GA5233@ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1504 Lines: 38 Pavel Machek wrote: > On Wed 2008-01-16 15:58:55, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: >> There's only one bit in the clone_flags left, so we won't be able >> to create more namespaces after we make it busy. Besides, for >> checkpoint/restart jobs we might want to create tasks with given >> pids (virtual of course). And nobody knows for sure what else might >> be required from clone() in the future. >> >> This is an attempt to create a extendable API for clone and unshare. >> Actually this patch is a request for comment about the overall >> design. If it will turn out to "look good", then we'll select some >> better names for new flag and data types. >> >> I use the last bit in the clone_flags for CLONE_LONGARG. When set it >> will denote that the child_tidptr is not a pointer to a tid storage, >> but the pointer to the struct long_clone_struct which currently >> looks like this: >> >> struct long_clone_arg { >> int size; >> }; > > Ugly as night, I'd say. (Al said it better). What about just adding > clone2 syscall, that takes u64? yes but we would need more something like : long sys_clone64(unsigned long flags_high, unsigned long flag_low) if we want the syscall to be supported on 32bit arch. clone2 is also being used on ia64 already. C. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/