Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-146523-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
From: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
To: tglx@linutronix.de,
	yury.norov@gmail.com,
	rafael@kernel.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	maz@kernel.org,
	florian.fainelli@broadcom.com,
	chenhuacai@kernel.org,
	jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com,
	anup@brainfault.org,
	palmer@dabbelt.com,
	samuel.holland@sifive.com,
	linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk,
	daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/7] irqchip/riscv-aplic-direct: Avoid explicit cpumask allocation on stack
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 16:54:52 +0800
Message-Id: <20240416085454.3547175-6-dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
In-Reply-To: <20240416085454.3547175-1-dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
References: <20240416085454.3547175-1-dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:shingroup.cn:qybglogicsvrgz:qybglogicsvrgz5a-1

In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as
for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of
stack space and make stack overflows more likely.

Use cpumask_first_and_and() to avoid the need for a temporary cpumask on
the stack.

Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c | 7 ++-----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c
index 06bace9b7497..4a3ffe856d6c 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c
@@ -54,15 +54,12 @@ static int aplic_direct_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *m
 	struct aplic_direct *direct = container_of(priv, struct aplic_direct, priv);
 	struct aplic_idc *idc;
 	unsigned int cpu, val;
-	struct cpumask amask;
 	void __iomem *target;
 
-	cpumask_and(&amask, &direct->lmask, mask_val);
-
 	if (force)
-		cpu = cpumask_first(&amask);
+		cpu = cpumask_first_and(&direct->lmask, mask_val);
 	else
-		cpu = cpumask_any_and(&amask, cpu_online_mask);
+		cpu = cpumask_first_and_and(&direct->lmask, mask_val, cpu_online_mask);
 
 	if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
 		return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.27.0