Received: by 2002:a05:6500:1b45:b0:1f5:f2ab:c469 with SMTP id cz5csp417266lqb; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 23:08:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCWazinntqOSRkUxo0PltYav1dBNS0TLKAG0YU+0SmTZldgw+6c3/OzBEO9GnkgXBijWERqJeedodo835ISUYGIkKvHoZbb2z9DBHzKm2A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG4Fwfg7vDBX/SIAhOVVtUGvmCK7b2pS8G6T5QeHY62e3gnc2X4fz43pXhhhqQ7LuUvksGC X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:530f:b0:56f:ffd1:2e32 with SMTP id eo15-20020a056402530f00b0056fffd12e32mr4621162edb.19.1713334127521; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 23:08:47 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:4601:e00::3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d1-20020a50cd41000000b00570176081c2si3960544edj.5.2024.04.16.23.08.47 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 Apr 2024 23:08:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-147979-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@amd.com header.s=selector1 header.b=aA4DwBbq; arc=fail (signature failed); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-147979-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-147979-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=amd.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A8BA1F2148C for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 06:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F049D537ED; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 06:08:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amd.com header.i=@amd.com header.b="aA4DwBbq" Received: from NAM12-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-mw2nam12on2074.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.244.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B365524D4 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 06:08:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=40.107.244.74 ARC-Seal:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713334118; cv=fail; b=l1jwXAbHmEP1l5vAOpUybHnbXBBGw58NXJYzfqniBh6vEQclmmLQHqnvWy2yXZ9BZYCjFQBDyETwUeMnFTeIhhIZqggxuaIgH9zYfEmQ9rwuYqVpFNijzLQoQCW9N/LJx6EotHXZ1hiphq3kutF/HpMAg6+JijxKV64Q3QevGnc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713334118; c=relaxed/simple; bh=X+Pg2+gd+okkOt/VHEgiITV/qFIPsYa4ZnwQIhFW05s=; h=Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=UOWLjb0keIR3JPtaewp+OusBqROYBLApZZ+f4kuBUHno3gxVps9gKOF59NlqPkWNnw7DdRsSM3Fxg5YC2Fw0Q7T4DXf5VxCzrdjGtFHTRVptumAB9ibjSDxv1zUDYwzva9tH2mOP9iaBpzUb3AX8jTiMTCUk44Fh90mxZaU7fkc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=2; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=amd.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amd.com header.i=@amd.com header.b=aA4DwBbq; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=40.107.244.74 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=amd.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=amd.com ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=lVOSn3v7P63T7RxUVRvjtn7+8j0hndDcZtquv3CRTxL8p5vyDA9a92Kn/wR72lDGqCBem+ci4TrfmTVGu2WlUwCzAM5skyHgBFRbedCSVrYRRjX45o1WtJvFs0Jyvq7reM6+eEbnNM+E1GXx/DQi3yqUJa6HgSfNrwDpsByIIbm5swhy9+K0IZh1dO1vzLlozmTmWhp4dQ+bp3qkVF1W27aIoe/HaIjJhvwAR38W8NjqBoWli/6sH4DX4aYTPzvVUOb9BMZYPj7iX0XLf6/5w2kcmbpDFLlJWY4pevmv3TGnvpJJINoeUaG3Pnuzirhve9azm/uA3CUlWFBY+bmanQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=d/6hAubT9yOm1ml7FjLbrEQ0kz9bbGN2y72q8rwZ4nI=; b=bkfK7jNq7ElBY3EXV6afE2uxBAHK8HrwuVBFqhMPebWwbNSLsOs3N/mxM8zEMP7zBQzIXu/A43Px+hx2CHlgOFsoV1s+SubUbiE7Y5jO4No8epPvTLm1+csgR3e1jFth0v4RpGgjWxt6ljg+DUf0BhnYyUA+xF5fBL6q/GDMwfAPqCfuDu5N1se+HpbhmQquHeLoOnKcSgEbN48ogG3U5n1ODv0DE2xdoeSEpeChxXzepb+WsSCuZJYhfheEC+7KR+Z6icTmHxoB+Vwcf1BDHo0JS3cz1RQp2S3Fa57EQVmfLQ94cokOYcVJTnzoJTmc5pBILD5YyWKxPwrkTXbYjg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=amd.com; dkim=pass header.d=amd.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amd.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=d/6hAubT9yOm1ml7FjLbrEQ0kz9bbGN2y72q8rwZ4nI=; b=aA4DwBbqCVltE6FIr0Ed9t6veREP0RBBUJzleWPU815zb01Ew6zen+jKJkn8+34+zOLSJCJBdoqRpQNIrwlpWZW8tiujYHQkhe8Sp5wDHpixNytX0dF30iTC1Q8Ru5ahdBI4QteM/NjaV3ENztexaPn6LfFEwKfx9ZfaLYb5m9g= Authentication-Results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=amd.com; Received: from MW2PR12MB2379.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:907:9::24) by SJ0PR12MB6989.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:448::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7452.50; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 06:08:33 +0000 Received: from MW2PR12MB2379.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::494b:99e2:884a:dca1]) by MW2PR12MB2379.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::494b:99e2:884a:dca1%3]) with mapi id 15.20.7472.037; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 06:08:32 +0000 Message-ID: <79abd35f-1e15-3585-c5dd-1f2841896f4f@amd.com> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:38:20 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.1 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] sched/eevdf: Skip eligibility check for current entity during wakeup preemption Content-Language: en-US From: K Prateek Nayak To: Youssef Esmat Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Valentin Schneider , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tobias Huschle , Luis Machado , Chen Yu , Abel Wu , Tianchen Ding , Xuewen Yan , "Gautham R. Shenoy" References: <20240325060226.1540-1-kprateek.nayak@amd.com> <20240325060226.1540-2-kprateek.nayak@amd.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: PN0PR01CA0047.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:1096:c01:49::11) To MW2PR12MB2379.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:907:9::24) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: MW2PR12MB2379:EE_|SJ0PR12MB6989:EE_ X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 6842ba69-bdfb-4c91-fa4c-08dc5ea4cecd X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255;CTRY:;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:MW2PR12MB2379.namprd12.prod.outlook.com;PTR:;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230031)(366007)(1800799015)(376005)(7416005);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: =?utf-8?B?eENYNTlNaFVmOE85VUZiQTlkY0FGQkJ2c0JUN3E0TGlkYUpTc2lOMm14aDdX?= =?utf-8?B?RlpCY0h4bE1jQU9lZDlhaitiejEvTThYaml2ZFlWTHpQWm5xWXp2NHVCK3o5?= =?utf-8?B?ZnNQc0Q3RVVmcG1rZG92M1dGVDlOOWlCT1gyZldBV0kyYlV1bEdQL1JZM3l3?= =?utf-8?B?di9XdHdMd1dJTWN6K1pndnZUdmRydnBCZ0l6Rmd3aXBNZzlXcEtrRlhiaXZJ?= =?utf-8?B?NUlZUDJVcmhOazY3Q1FvTSsxY2NvSHp5ZUF1SGdjTkZMcnE2M2o2NjVtaWNG?= =?utf-8?B?OGVsWmt0STJiUGNzR1JCQUdmU2xLazlOdXhBSGVKcm5oUFY1SmJFNGlWRmpw?= =?utf-8?B?ditWOWdRcWY2UWYrd3A4TksrMFlFWi9lMHg0Q096cmVDSWt4WFFaTDdlNEpk?= =?utf-8?B?bjA1RFlWTVBSbnQrUVM2UVNhL2p5eDJjdFAvM1h3U3ozbWp6NEhLOTRIMTNo?= =?utf-8?B?ZWVHUWpwdjQ2TzAxVTFKc3BoYk5pUzdROUt3eFhOZ1ZKVUNPRUlmVmwwVVBE?= =?utf-8?B?UG4vbHFmdUlkd0VRWUt2a3lOU2RnTUpFQzhnVHdXazdwQklqYXpITFNDdGhv?= =?utf-8?B?Tk1KQWhnTDdvaVBuZ0U0cDJEdXJGNVBlMmlhVDF1SEdqb3p3SDl2SFlBQm9y?= =?utf-8?B?Ym8wTndicjFnUlM1b1phUVVvSkhBM0YwOEQvdFk3bm1oSVBYQ2JEOFRUUFNL?= =?utf-8?B?N0tYeWRPaDhEWUNEYldsaVpOOXEzT0hJcXZPYml2QitGM1g5cXBLRVI1YVdP?= =?utf-8?B?bGI2TlF5S09ULyswZkFwMXY3Z1ZiN3I5YmpaN3lETElIUTFRNUtYMDFEdUlY?= =?utf-8?B?SmQvc2R5dzN1RTRSNjV2OHpKY3A3ejJGQkY0MXZLbnlZcHh3Rlh1bVZKdjZy?= =?utf-8?B?Skt3Q0FZaXVxb2h6bXlFYnVGbHNyQTl4YVk2Mnc3em1qR1hWRlJKamVYbG9m?= =?utf-8?B?NThoTVlZTXg3cmNDYXNvUForVDh6RGk1Y3J0VTBIY0dwSEdGeUhraE5qeE5u?= =?utf-8?B?d1hHOHdoTUdkcUllNUg0VDROemNldUVnSUduN2FxRnN4SCtjUXN4aXpuamZr?= =?utf-8?B?VmNCc0Z3d3B4bmd6ZkRCNzZPMUIzM0h2V1dNZjU1MFg0Nk9qUjliSkVuV1BB?= =?utf-8?B?eXdLeDBHQzMzbS80NHU3aEZnSEhOVUk2RFIrK2NDUC9NT2J0UDBuL0tDcTdJ?= =?utf-8?B?MGo5MWlhRHFDcWMyR0xnTkZJRHkwNXpOZyttU1V3MlpoR1MwZy9xUXhsMXFV?= =?utf-8?B?bHVvK1BWUmtncTJJV1FQK2g2WkNpODJ0a2pkWFJjaGtRcEhZdFp0UHpMNG5Y?= =?utf-8?B?aGVqd0FyZHZZeDNZTU1la2NNbzV4WDZyVmpLYjBNSjFFajQvSGlmQlB5Zmlw?= =?utf-8?B?UFBLSHp1TEEwZnhRenkvUVAyTUx0Q1A1dmxQYjdhbjBQaVhXSzFRK0ozQjhG?= =?utf-8?B?NFlBUWJaakdRQkdPRU43Q2RPK2x2MW5EWjViSW8xcFY0SVI0TDVXeGVwSW5U?= =?utf-8?B?QmtSeTY5SjlKRFlzaVZIaE9qRjBZTFZJalc5RHFiR0ZSZ2x4TE81TGlzMEVD?= =?utf-8?B?NGEzaFY4SElRclRnNjMycWo5Tnc1NmZpeFZGYlZrSFJNSDhuYTViUlNZQW41?= =?utf-8?B?K2FMME93Zkx2TDg4dTl4alU1cDRVL0xzUUZpbWV3MG1TQ2FpQ1I5SmZ6aE1r?= =?utf-8?B?RWNFSWM2M1ltOGJYVHdrZ3VQZDk5MnZkeFE1WVhJTnZoYU00ZVlXMjF0OG83?= =?utf-8?B?WWp5NjdNZUNwQ294UDJQeWNBelpiemNrZVdrUFduLzR0MzVwaU1hZWhKVGZq?= =?utf-8?B?YVZHSWhVNUxqSVo3STVGQUl3L1ZpWko3d09memtueC90Z3JkRUFaSWIvSENW?= =?utf-8?B?SHN2N1BOTGxTRE1qU0FiQzUxUXpCckdEbXFpbk44dVZPbjdremgyaFJ0NHdv?= =?utf-8?B?amNYY3JpbktoQkIydzV5MlVZSHhudEFhdGhyOWhwWFZ6dG9UQ3dmUVI1NXgv?= =?utf-8?B?TFZOVEp0dDVNc1FidVlVZ0tmSWdzK2RRMWdadm1rVEJFUmp4UmUrUWcvajFU?= =?utf-8?B?dVA1d0dwc1Rtb3FDNjJmMzhtb2NySitoVXh2MlNjNzdqWjM2NGorZzk4Vi9B?= =?utf-8?Q?opYQ4upLO22ENHnCbM5E/me1v?= X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 6842ba69-bdfb-4c91-fa4c-08dc5ea4cecd X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MW2PR12MB2379.namprd12.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Apr 2024 06:08:32.1099 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: 0ovSgm1kqjymEKRos7IsyjtYcQd34XcRf13kK0h4OWh9P1T10893mCtfBGs98gg48NfnJu2boI/QpMnJxrrgJQ== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SJ0PR12MB6989 Hello Youssef, On 3/26/2024 8:36 AM, K Prateek Nayak wrote: >> [..snip..] >> >> Thanks for sharing this Prateek. >> We actually noticed we could also gain performance by disabling >> eligibility checks (but disable it on all paths). >> The following are a few threads we had on the topic: >> >> Discussion around eligibility: >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+q576MS0-MV1Oy-eecvmYpvNT3tqxD8syzrpxQ-Zk310hvRbw@mail.gmail.com/ >> Some of our results: >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+q576Mov1jpdfZhPBoy_hiVh3xSWuJjXdP3nS4zfpqfOXtq7Q@mail.gmail.com/ >> Sched feature to disable eligibility: >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231013030213.2472697-1-youssefesmat@chromium.org/ >> > > Thank you for pointing me to the discussions. I'll give this a spin on > my machine and report back what I see. Hope some of it will help during > the OSPM discussion :) Sorry about the delay but on a positive note, I do not see any concerning regressions after dropping the eligibility criteria. I'll leave the full results from my testing below. o System Details - 3rd Generation EPYC System - 2 x 64C/128T - NPS1 mode o Kernels tip: tip:sched/core at commit 4475cd8bfd9b ("sched/balancing: Simplify the sg_status bitmask and use separate ->overloaded and ->overutilized flags") eie: (everyone is eligible) tip + vruntime_eligible() and entity_eligible() always returns true. o Results ================================================================== Test : hackbench Units : Normalized time in seconds Interpretation: Lower is better Statistic : AMean ================================================================== Case: tip[pct imp](CV) eie[pct imp](CV) 1-groups 1.00 [ -0.00]( 1.94) 0.95 [ 5.11]( 2.56) 2-groups 1.00 [ -0.00]( 2.41) 0.97 [ 2.80]( 1.52) 4-groups 1.00 [ -0.00]( 1.16) 0.95 [ 5.01]( 1.04) 8-groups 1.00 [ -0.00]( 1.72) 0.96 [ 4.37]( 1.01) 16-groups 1.00 [ -0.00]( 2.16) 0.94 [ 5.88]( 2.30) ================================================================== Test : tbench Units : Normalized throughput Interpretation: Higher is better Statistic : AMean ================================================================== Clients: tip[pct imp](CV) eie[pct imp](CV) 1 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.69) 1.00 [ 0.05]( 0.61) 2 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.25) 1.00 [ 0.06]( 0.51) 4 1.00 [ 0.00]( 1.04) 0.98 [ -1.69]( 1.21) 8 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.72) 1.00 [ -0.13]( 0.56) 16 1.00 [ 0.00]( 2.40) 1.00 [ 0.43]( 0.63) 32 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.62) 0.98 [ -1.80]( 2.18) 64 1.00 [ 0.00]( 1.19) 0.98 [ -2.13]( 1.26) 128 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.91) 1.00 [ 0.37]( 0.50) 256 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.52) 1.00 [ -0.11]( 0.21) 512 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.36) 1.02 [ 1.54]( 0.58) 1024 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.26) 1.01 [ 1.21]( 0.41) ================================================================== Test : stream-10 Units : Normalized Bandwidth, MB/s Interpretation: Higher is better Statistic : HMean ================================================================== Test: tip[pct imp](CV) eie[pct imp](CV) Copy 1.00 [ 0.00]( 5.01) 1.01 [ 1.27]( 4.63) Scale 1.00 [ 0.00]( 6.93) 1.03 [ 2.66]( 5.20) Add 1.00 [ 0.00]( 5.94) 1.03 [ 3.41]( 4.99) Triad 1.00 [ 0.00]( 6.40) 0.95 [ -4.69]( 8.29) ================================================================== Test : stream-100 Units : Normalized Bandwidth, MB/s Interpretation: Higher is better Statistic : HMean ================================================================== Test: tip[pct imp](CV) eie[pct imp](CV) Copy 1.00 [ 0.00]( 2.84) 1.00 [ -0.37]( 2.44) Scale 1.00 [ 0.00]( 5.26) 1.00 [ 0.21]( 3.88) Add 1.00 [ 0.00]( 4.98) 1.00 [ 0.11]( 1.15) Triad 1.00 [ 0.00]( 1.60) 0.96 [ -3.72]( 5.26) ================================================================== Test : netperf Units : Normalized Througput Interpretation: Higher is better Statistic : AMean ================================================================== Clients: tip[pct imp](CV) eie[pct imp](CV) 1-clients 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.90) 1.00 [ -0.09]( 0.16) 2-clients 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.77) 0.99 [ -0.89]( 0.97) 4-clients 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.63) 0.99 [ -1.03]( 1.53) 8-clients 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.52) 0.99 [ -0.86]( 1.66) 16-clients 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.43) 0.99 [ -0.91]( 0.79) 32-clients 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.88) 0.98 [ -2.37]( 1.42) 64-clients 1.00 [ 0.00]( 1.63) 0.96 [ -4.07]( 0.91) * 128-clients 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.94) 1.00 [ -0.30]( 0.94) 256-clients 1.00 [ 0.00]( 5.08) 0.95 [ -4.95]( 3.36) 512-clients 1.00 [ 0.00](51.89) 0.99 [ -0.93](51.00) * This seems to be the only point of regression with low CV. I'll rerun this and report back if I see a consistent dip but for the time being I'm not worried. ================================================================== Test : schbench Units : Normalized 99th percentile latency in us Interpretation: Lower is better Statistic : Median ================================================================== #workers: tip[pct imp](CV) eie[pct imp](CV) 1 1.00 [ -0.00](30.01) 0.97 [ 3.12](14.32) 2 1.00 [ -0.00](26.14) 1.23 [-22.58](13.48) 4 1.00 [ -0.00](13.22) 1.00 [ -0.00]( 6.04) 8 1.00 [ -0.00]( 6.23) 1.00 [ -0.00](13.09) 16 1.00 [ -0.00]( 3.49) 1.02 [ -1.69]( 3.43) 32 1.00 [ -0.00]( 2.20) 0.98 [ 2.13]( 2.47) 64 1.00 [ -0.00]( 7.17) 0.88 [ 12.50]( 3.18) 128 1.00 [ -0.00]( 2.79) 1.02 [ -2.46]( 8.29) 256 1.00 [ -0.00](13.02) 1.01 [ -1.34](37.58) 512 1.00 [ -0.00]( 4.27) 0.79 [ 21.49]( 2.41) ================================================================== Test : DeathStarBench Units : Normalized throughput Interpretation: Higher is better Statistic : Mean ================================================================== Pinning scaling tip eie (pct imp) 1CCD 1 1.00 1.15 (%diff: 15.68%) 2CCD 2 1.00 0.99 (%diff: -1.12%) 4CCD 4 1.00 1.11 (%diff: 11.65%) 8CCD 8 1.00 1.05 (%diff: 4.98%) -- > > [..snip..] > I'll try to get data from more workloads, will update the thread with when it arrives. -- Thanks and Regards, Prateek