Received: by 2002:a05:6500:1b45:b0:1f5:f2ab:c469 with SMTP id cz5csp474282lqb; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 01:47:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCWtV450k9Pt0F7BojyfJZWWR7JJ+z1V1ajwKPHuIvgdRFCw78FyjyMFFCvJvLgJcgJIreFskgeykb8z0GzgfaR3CUJFTLIR39tyQNKJhg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IESijU5aBYd1vBxfgbnq7JAxiiUSS9lkvFXBwNAZfLJcXUFMe0VWaUYpvYG9XPBxWf9JPrO X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:370f:b0:78e:13f1:303e with SMTP id de15-20020a05620a370f00b0078e13f1303emr19609097qkb.54.1713343647764; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 01:47:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.199.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u7-20020a05620a454700b0078ec7868b03si15036829qkp.472.2024.04.17.01.47.27 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 17 Apr 2024 01:47:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-148168-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=XtnHhhYt; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-148168-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-148168-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F6991C21C4F for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59D81292C7; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:47:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="XtnHhhYt" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D91AA5D8F6; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:47:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713343641; cv=none; b=lCa2bPg97ePSksnKr7K4EJLTiAbe2Qrr8gcTv+kOisu4L0lh7B4/CcFOhydDl4JovWUJX7NxFrqxU0Au/DtvsrZsqlszQpajaEhrmEyPjEWsAv+VB4nSGlfp+AohSLfOCTRy+9Q7pU3prLrsh1PNjDJ0hWcN7bajLTOzT6vTc+0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713343641; c=relaxed/simple; bh=A5ttHuzOe/HMJsBE4szfcXeW6bosf6khB8tSfgYBqUc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=cCrjCR1rI3bPsZwAZuiZWIzgVaGDfYzt817bJS8TIy0Ki2+7RmqpWkfPbzFh2yKB3Wo3evkdNXyC+9+9Av1Xrhsz1lATFc9PxKTB7be/F5yEDo+yDdozC+k+FEUXNZERX2kWHm1XpioaBk+AylMkQEuG8RyNzxS2tlxRyNxX0NI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=XtnHhhYt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1713343640; x=1744879640; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=A5ttHuzOe/HMJsBE4szfcXeW6bosf6khB8tSfgYBqUc=; b=XtnHhhYtYNbnP7TDIdHKTkZdYpuXA2B0tErxWuqfF6ZViWO7zx1WWEDS qHJ/Q+m2MIvGl/6WPgLn6J5wY/eikuzIf+UjNwvHbAe1EYY1tZ9lS3C6m TtaU65wpTUw3yb8lDjzqcDsH8y/lI2gfnDBD9oMGEa1QHX5A4M0PRBbOo fvzQroLFpklxsWoKBJOwVEJJUkjp82DXhduLCr11hcRsizOf24ppfF8dl 45m5+HSJmNiwgRY0owlibrp5MJnd/mcVqlpEReEdl76jWPosECzIG3AKL pXhrZbp2f3ZXDe4C/O3gxC1MP9ceEun/DNmdKHwf6FT9JWwKPNC0hczWi g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: GgfWlV72TgaNmKPrmYb2PQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: J+FIwNUXRNSK5xK63VJ8tA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11046"; a="11766169" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,208,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="11766169" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Apr 2024 01:47:19 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 1linExoaQLywdjNzzQ9S8g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: NQUFbEeBTP+ECIGwdkj68Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,208,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="22627863" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmviesa007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Apr 2024 01:47:17 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rx0wl-00000004y2U-0XuF; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:47:15 +0300 Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:47:14 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: "Luck, Tony" Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Bjorn Helgaas , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "patches@lists.linux.dev" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 52/74] x86/cpu/vfm: Update drivers/pci/pci-mid.c Message-ID: References: <20240416212219.9643-1-tony.luck@intel.com> <20240416213813.GA171111@bhelgaas> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 09:51:43PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote: .. > > I guess "vfm" is > > some kind of a hint, but I don't know what it means. I suppose it is > > for "vendor, family, model". > > Yes. vfm is indeed vendor-family-model. Agreed the commit comment > is lacking details without the context of the cover letter and the other > patches in this series. You see, TLAs are cryptic, that's why I internally proposed different naming. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko