Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-149215-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240410072102.1200869-1-andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
 <ZhpC3lLD-BHqJEZz@ishi> <CAMRc=MerqbYue_uubSkr0ta3wr+yQxfFMfk+vAUZa+C2oR+udQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHp75VcofgAQLFVLdsA-A1AkjVzQBJWtam=w00+z9-rueZyv8A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMRc=MejJTnawn1=_x9Va-QJRctjoc3TJanVqQ0uZbpmDzpyjw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHp75VcXoEhxA+qO=MMoUanZeCP5hPXd9q7n-8AuRrotEfbYFw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMRc=McrxEeS-BdgSEswJ+x_qDYJ7Gn_fKP8n-ctCzk2BuP29A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=McrxEeS-BdgSEswJ+x_qDYJ7Gn_fKP8n-ctCzk2BuP29A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 23:49:25 +0300
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdDRYU7UguQQSm+QTRPMpsteno2pEQ2kz_03cEjFatJXg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: sch: Switch to memory mapped IO accessors
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: William Breathitt Gray <wbg@kernel.org>, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>, 
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 11:46=E2=80=AFPM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl=
> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 10:41=E2=80=AFPM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 9:19=E2=80=AFPM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev=
pl> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 10:05=E2=80=AFAM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 12:17=E2=80=AFAM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@=
bgdev.pl> wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 10:31=E2=80=AFAM William Breathitt Gray <=
wbg@kernel.org> wrote:

..

> > > > > I applied it as is, if anyone wants it, this can be sent on top o=
f it.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, but I assumed this should go via my tree and as PR to you. =
At
> > > > least I have it already in my for-next.
> > >
> > > You didn't respond in any way about picking it up.
> >
> > Hmm... I'm the author of it and I'm a maintainer for that driver. I'm
> > not sure if it's mandatory to respond for that purpose. Usually I
> > asked the opposite, i.e. when I'm not going to pick the thing up.
> >
> > > Can you just drop
> > > it from your branch?
> >
> > It's possible, but I will need to rebase, which is not a good thing to
> > perform. What about just leaving it as is and letting git to (nicely)
> > solve this?
>
> It won't be solved nicely, we'll get a warning about the same commit
> appearing twice with different hashes.

Oh, this sounds like a new check in Linux Next? Or somewhere else?

> Whatever, I dropped it from my tree, it was the HEAD anyway.

Thank you!

--=20
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko