Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-149191-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Message-ID: <a44a9ac5-5afa-4226-8a59-fab3e44af352@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:23:52 -0500
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] tsm: Runtime measurement registers ABI
To: "Xing, Cedric" <cedric.xing@intel.com>,
 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
 Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
 Samuel Ortiz <sameo@rivosinc.com>
Cc: Qinkun Bao <qinkun@google.com>, "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
 Dionna Amalie Glaze <dionnaglaze@google.com>, biao.lu@intel.com,
 linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <a255bc36-2438-41b7-b304-bcf7a6628bef@linux.intel.com>
 <42e14f74d3819c95fdb97cd2e9b2829dcb1b1563.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
 <1557f98a-3d52-4a02-992b-4401c7c85dd7@linux.intel.com>
 <85b7a4a679eada1d17b311bf004c2d9e18ab5cd3.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
 <b8140cc8-a56b-40f6-a593-7be49db14c77@intel.com>
 <fe1722c3618a8216cb53b8fd3f1b7cbb6fdff5a0.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
 <65c2e4aa54a0_d4122947f@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch>
 <22088ed3-51a4-415f-932c-db84c92a2812@intel.com>
 <527da630-4952-4b1d-80c0-5a87997ff9fd@linux.intel.com>
 <332775d7218843d6cc168c963d76e6841eab5d5b.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
 <65c691e13a50d_afa42948a@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
 <226df539-b3f4-4099-b6a6-293fa200c536@intel.com>
 <982e19fcd71c41a162ba664281eb0a68d9dc960c.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
 <3d5ffd62-beff-4394-91e7-715b348b7bae@intel.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Dan Middleton <dan.middleton@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <3d5ffd62-beff-4394-91e7-715b348b7bae@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 3/4/24 7:19 PM, Xing, Cedric wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> In the past couple of weeks I've been thinking about what should be a 
> good log format that can be conformant to existing standards and 
> accommodate future applications at the same time. After discussing 
> with folks from Alibaba and Intel internally, I created this issue - 
> https://github.com/confidential-containers/guest-components/issues/495 
> to document what I've found. Although it was written for CoCo, the 
> design I believe is CEL (Canonical Event Log) conformant and generic 
> enough to be adopted by the kernel. Hence, I revive this thread to 
> solicit your opinion. Your valuable time and feedback will be highly 
> appreciated!
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Cedric
>

Hi,

Closing the loop on testing format options with CNCF CoCo as an adopter
community...
There was a robust discussion in the issue [1] posted ~1.5 months back 
on the
previous note on this thread.
It seems the conversation has tailed off with agreement that the NELR format
would work for that containers community.
I think that's a good signal for this approach to move forward.

[1] https://github.com/confidential-containers/guest-components/issues/495

Regards,
Dan