Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-149374-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>, Alexander Gordeev
 <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
 Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Vincent Guittot
 <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
 linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin
 <npiggin@gmail.com>, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik
 <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 0/5] sched/vtime: vtime.h headers cleanup
In-Reply-To: <Zh-kEvJbNR2krwmx@localhost.localdomain>
References: <cover.1712760275.git.agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
 <Zh-kEvJbNR2krwmx@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:00:43 +1000
Message-ID: <87h6fzbi2s.fsf@mail.lhotse>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> writes:
> Le Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 05:09:43PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev a =C3=A9crit :
>> Hi All,
>>=20
>> There are no changes since the last post, just a re-send.
>>=20
>> v2:
>> - patch 4: commit message reworded (Heiko)
>> - patch 5: vtime.h is removed from Kbuild scripts (PowerPC only) (Heiko)
>>=20
>> v1:
>> Please find a small cleanup to vtime_task_switch() wiring.
>> I split it into smaller patches to allow separate PowerPC
>> vs s390 reviews. Otherwise patches 2+3 and 4+5 could have
>> been merged.
>>=20
>> I tested it on s390 and compile-tested it on 32- and 64-bit
>> PowerPC and few other major architectures only, but it is
>> only of concern for CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE-capable
>> ones (AFAICT).
>>=20
>> Thanks!
>
> It probably makes sense to apply the whole series to the scheduler tree.
> Does any powerpc or s390 maintainer oppose to that?

No objection. It has acks and reviews from powerpc.

cheers