Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-149806-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 12:23:45 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] gpiolib: acpi: Add fwnode name to the GPIO
 interrupt label
Message-ID: <ZiDmoT9gn7cFaYyV@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20240417103829.2324960-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <20240417103829.2324960-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <20240418044907.GO112498@black.fi.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240418044907.GO112498@black.fi.intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 07:49:07AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 01:37:27PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > It's ambiguous to have a device-related index in the GPIO interrupt
> > label as most of the devices will have it the same or very similar.
> > Extend label with fwnode name for better granularity. It significantly
> > reduces the scope of searching among devices.
> 
> Can you add an example here how it looks like before and after the
> patch?

Sure:

Before:

  GpioInt() 0
  GpioInt() 0

After:

  NIO1 GpioInt(0)
  URT0 GpioInt(0)

Assuming I update this when applying, can you give your tag?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko