Received: by 2002:a05:6500:1b45:b0:1f5:f2ab:c469 with SMTP id cz5csp1328278lqb; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 06:56:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCUEX1lGu1YqlnkTatPRpI+oS9Q85uG+wBBH2L1z/RvNooxVq9aUo88YsUlNOSoO50NiIFZwaJiETRu5g1V5MIbbk9wWTYrGllZprlNPUw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEKBtDJskGHBA5HnvVAv7M3DegiB1ogYHTiFOfq42+cKkctnkKpfmC/Grk5MNK6y7MJg7hr X-Received: by 2002:a25:8e0b:0:b0:dcd:59e4:620c with SMTP id p11-20020a258e0b000000b00dcd59e4620cmr2995431ybl.49.1713448591357; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 06:56:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1713448591; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=x96OOrhvFlKYQIksEICzoUIwuoLSu6tUKVDVHnSuqNuQ7p3/spciltu+nMBJmkdlLD yhqlV5kigJMlOyroLHPkY5eNxqGtJ20HcKDMMxn8YhCsUdH4vlC22rVsxMoo3yUJYe6S VWXZDy8AEGA5LBya0EuEtPNtODAKtXLGAbcIA7N650l4WCvcG9zoshT5wunvuF7xn1bh CnEWs7Wfkf13kE4bKc2HBE2UO5sAY9C7H7iQgdJfsVM5Y/Fjvqdc2DrADfw7yl9vmzi6 gfMvGDF5XcbcDvrAo4x8PCN6vuBBCKuW3lgmVgoC2FmcqO0V/jjo0smQ27bARIKRYNjp B6Yg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id :date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=8uA8pm/dUHOCDPcKLdsvyRFplEDz9iAqBOzAnrW+3Wk=; fh=wmH6eZgtoFCyes/zVTYi+VaxxdPmNW9hqdNd8ZTZ4XU=; b=G/u0Cq4cdrWs/IslNN4nkUjBgr/VZQAIEyCgzZeKUmDEj5bY4d4WtO+xiuebxNV3KW /fSs3OXemiY7xyfFJihKVsh59ad3PWULxan+uxRj/X3wJXVs3j2k8eDfEIJ+zki7/fKT wnE6dP9JnjM/wG6OjKra7EQ0ltxt/AyL4al1YNALJ44WwbwNiT7WRr11oPu/Sbw3I9Rx 8ftmL9uxCicLuzMKPZpalREZFcwsLyBDWdFEuDYootXDC2fnkLQTBnZDdnUsPvXOdyqk H2Qu+4r44mr2lYROi47fch8pzs8fys+xVVZ9yW40qtL3/5HhB1Iz4yPRpPdtEWQnBFq6 maYg==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=huawei.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=huawei.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-150216-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-150216-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r7-20020a0562140c4700b0069692b38274si1474575qvj.560.2024.04.18.06.56.31 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 18 Apr 2024 06:56:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-150216-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=huawei.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=huawei.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-150216-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-150216-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ABDA1C23410 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:56:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527BE163A80; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 139EB161900; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713448580; cv=none; b=G2gJtX7YXE4F+WVzzOFHYaQec2HWzVxEhWaY32nVak8CHUKaqQVqnXqkdDUs5AVVmtGC+kYE/itP/SO88P0x5ia+h0uZVB0D/d49U/LOAVkfgBhVJ1gyp+lyJMRVotUp89xETNg69x9thfkUzM8+Df1d3zU3o/nB6/p9CI9X9b8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713448580; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5RgsOScvkUjas7kOIZs8AaBnCXl2yaDDWXRqeR1JYww=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MIq/7hMTJuwd7fS2X1g9VokImXLtdldNCzBcvLlU7cwKU4DK1md+YwpQuKZmOvI7Tl7emDhs6d3UcdMc60Esb3LHyDNJpzkn/I49yfswmyw6af7dWPQlqzwTkfmeAu5tLY+OVUArW3Y/kjAMlDYWGzNV97sbFZLl4MoDyO4tKZI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VKzlp0kLHz6D8yY; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 21:54:14 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8522140B55; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 21:56:16 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:56:16 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Subject: [PATCH v7 04/16] ACPI: processor: Move checks and availability of acpi_processor earlier Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:54:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20240418135412.14730-5-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240418135412.14730-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240418135412.14730-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml100002.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.241) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) Make the per_cpu(processors, cpu) entries available earlier so that they are available in arch_register_cpu() as ARM64 will need access to the acpi_handle to distinguish between acpi_processor_add() and earlier registration attempts (which will fail as _STA cannot be checked). Reorder the remove flow to clear this per_cpu() after arch_unregister_cpu() has completed, allowing it to be used in there as well. Note that on x86 for the CPU hotplug case, the pr->id prior to acpi_map_cpu() may be invalid. Thus the per_cpu() structures must be initialized after that call or after checking the ID is valid (not hotplug path). Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v7: Swap order with acpi_unmap_cpu() in acpi_processor_remove() to keep it in reverse order of the setup path. (thanks Salil) Fix an issue with placement of CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU guards. v6: As per discussion in v5 thread, don't use the cpu->dev and make this data available earlier by moving the assignment checks int acpi_processor_get_info(). --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index ba0a6f0ac841..ac7ddb30f10e 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -183,8 +183,36 @@ static void __init acpi_pcc_cpufreq_init(void) {} #endif /* CONFIG_X86 */ /* Initialization */ +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, processor_device_array); + +static void acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(struct acpi_processor *pr, + struct acpi_device *device) +{ + BUG_ON(pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids); + /* + * Buggy BIOS check. + * ACPI id of processors can be reported wrongly by the BIOS. + * Don't trust it blindly + */ + if (per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != NULL && + per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != device) { + dev_warn(&device->dev, + "BIOS reported wrong ACPI id %d for the processor\n", + pr->id); + /* Give up, but do not abort the namespace scan. */ + return; + } + /* + * processor_device_array is not cleared on errors to allow buggy BIOS + * checks. + */ + per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = device; + per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = pr; +} + #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU -static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr) +static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr, + struct acpi_device *device) { int ret; @@ -198,6 +226,8 @@ static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr) if (ret) goto out; + acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(pr, device); + ret = arch_register_cpu(pr->id); if (ret) { acpi_unmap_cpu(pr->id); @@ -217,7 +247,8 @@ static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr) return ret; } #else -static inline int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr) +static inline int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr, + struct acpi_device *device) { return -ENODEV; } @@ -232,6 +263,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) acpi_status status = AE_OK; static int cpu0_initialized; unsigned long long value; + int ret; acpi_processor_errata(); @@ -316,10 +348,12 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) * because cpuid <-> apicid mapping is persistent now. */ if (invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) || !cpu_present(pr->id)) { - int ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr); + ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr, device); if (ret) - return ret; + goto err; + } else { + acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(pr, device); } /* @@ -357,6 +391,10 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) arch_fix_phys_package_id(pr->id, value); return 0; + +err: + per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL; + return ret; } /* @@ -365,8 +403,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) * (cpu_data(cpu)) values, like CPU feature flags, family, model, etc. * Such things have to be put in and set up by the processor driver's .probe(). */ -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, processor_device_array); - static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device, const struct acpi_device_id *id) { @@ -395,28 +431,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device, if (result) /* Processor is not physically present or unavailable */ return 0; - BUG_ON(pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids); - - /* - * Buggy BIOS check. - * ACPI id of processors can be reported wrongly by the BIOS. - * Don't trust it blindly - */ - if (per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != NULL && - per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != device) { - dev_warn(&device->dev, - "BIOS reported wrong ACPI id %d for the processor\n", - pr->id); - /* Give up, but do not abort the namespace scan. */ - goto err; - } - /* - * processor_device_array is not cleared on errors to allow buggy BIOS - * checks. - */ - per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = device; - per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = pr; - dev = get_cpu_device(pr->id); if (!dev) { result = -ENODEV; @@ -469,10 +483,6 @@ static void acpi_processor_remove(struct acpi_device *device) device_release_driver(pr->dev); acpi_unbind_one(pr->dev); - /* Clean up. */ - per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = NULL; - per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL; - cpu_maps_update_begin(); cpus_write_lock(); @@ -480,6 +490,10 @@ static void acpi_processor_remove(struct acpi_device *device) arch_unregister_cpu(pr->id); acpi_unmap_cpu(pr->id); + /* Clean up. */ + per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = NULL; + per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL; + cpus_write_unlock(); cpu_maps_update_done(); -- 2.39.2