Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-150844-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 15:53:14 -0700
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Beau Belgrave <beaub@linux.microsoft.com>, mingo@redhat.com,
	acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
	irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, primiano@google.com,
	aahringo@redhat.com, dcook@linux.microsoft.com,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] perf: Correlating user process data to samples
Message-ID: <20240418225314.rbg7qwszbsvezz76@treble>
References: <20240412001732.475-1-beaub@linux.microsoft.com>
 <20240412071245.GD30852@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20240412163724.GB467-beaub@linux.microsoft.com>
 <20240413105338.GD40213@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20240413084857.147c6f40@rorschach.local.home>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240413084857.147c6f40@rorschach.local.home>

On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 08:48:57AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 12:53:38 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:37:24AM -0700, Beau Belgrave wrote:
> > 
> > > > Anyway, since we typically run stuff from NMI context, accessing user
> > > > data is 'interesting'. As such I would really like to make this work
> > > > depend on the call-graph rework that pushes all the user access bits
> > > > into return-to-user.  
> > > 
> > > Cool, I assume that's the SFRAME work? Are there pointers to work I
> > > could look at and think about what a rebase looks like? Or do you have
> > > someone in mind I should work with for this?  
> > 
> > I've been offline for a little while and still need to catch up with
> > things myself.
> > 
> > Josh was working on that when I dropped off IIRC, I'm not entirely sure
> > where things are at currently (and there is no way I can ever hope to
> > process the backlog).
> > 
> > Anybody know where we are with that?
> 
> It's still very much on my RADAR, but with layoffs and such, my
> priorities have unfortunately changed. I'm hoping to start helping out
> in the near future though (in a month or two).
> 
> Josh was working on it, but I think he got pulled off onto other
> priorities too :-p

Yeah, this is still a priority for me and I hope to get back to it over
the next few weeks (crosses fingers).

-- 
Josh