Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758333AbYAYIn4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jan 2008 03:43:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755418AbYAYIEU (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jan 2008 03:04:20 -0500 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:62795 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759082AbYAYIES convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jan 2008 03:04:18 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,249,1199692800"; d="scan'208";a="371142923" x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: RE: [PATCH]PCIE ASPM support - takes 3 Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:01:32 +0800 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20080124172258.GA5447@ucw.cz> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [PATCH]PCIE ASPM support - takes 3 Thread-Index: AchfIrxIeAS6vWJrTea4Y44q0zyudgABYovA References: <1200621388.8965.3.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> <20080124172258.GA5447@ucw.cz> From: "Li, Shaohua" To: "Pavel Machek" Cc: "lkml" , "linux-pci" , "Greg KH" , "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" , "Kok, Auke-jan H" , "Matthew Wilcox" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jan 2008 08:01:40.0062 (UTC) FILETIME=[84283FE0:01C85F28] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 984 Lines: 28 > > >Hi! > >> v3->v2, fixed the issues Matthew Wilcox raised. >> >> PCI Express ASPM defines a protocol for PCI Express components in the D0 >> state to reduce Link power by placing their Links into a low power state >> and instructing the other end of the Link to do likewise. This >> capability allows hardware-autonomous, dynamic Link power reduction >> beyond what is achievable by software-only controlled power management. >> However, The device should be configured by software appropriately. >> Enabling ASPM will save power, but will introduce device latency. > >How big is the latency? 1msec? 10msec? 100usec? Haven't accurate number, but in one device, it declaims L0s latency is < 128ns, L1 latency is < 64us. Thanks, Shaohua -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/