Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-151230-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:56:29 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= <kw@linux.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mhi@lists.linux.dev, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] PCI: endpoint: Rename BME to Bus Master Enable
Message-ID: <20240419092629.GA3636@thinkpad>
References: <20240418-pci-epf-rework-v3-0-222a5d1ed2e5@linaro.org>
 <20240418-pci-epf-rework-v3-3-222a5d1ed2e5@linaro.org>
 <ZiEy4EVcVpUry9qn@ryzen>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <ZiEy4EVcVpUry9qn@ryzen>

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 04:49:04PM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 05:28:31PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > BME which stands for 'Bus Master Enable' is not defined in the PCIe base
> > spec even though it is commonly referred in many places (vendor docs). But
> > to align with the spec, let's rename it to its expansion 'Bus Master
> > Enable'.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > ---
> 
> Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> 
> 
> Outside the scope of this patch/series:
> Do we perhaps want to add a bus_master_enable() callback also for the
> pci-epf-test driver?
> 

Makes sense to me.

> In my opinion, the test driver should be "the driver" that tests that
> all the EPF features/callbacks work, at least a basic test "does it
> work at all". Other EPF drivers can implement the callbacks, and do
> more intelligent things, i.e. more than just seeing that "it works".
> 

Agree. Feel free to send a patch :)

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்