Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-151997-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Message-ID: <77272c635a928f3582ce53766b20c747.sboyd@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <y7i7vwl7h2xop2ifh72vj5brtq7vd7tf72tst7k7r74plguhgn@cqs5fzplfk5i>
References: <202403270305.ydvX9xq1-lkp@intel.com> <20240327073310.520950-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <d95554f623f023a2f5499fa2f6f76567.sboyd@kernel.org> <xfaf22rf6gnrxpinkciybsyk4dx2bfqgozv6udwymegtcgd26i@jq5be7fm5lhi> <y7i7vwl7h2xop2ifh72vj5brtq7vd7tf72tst7k7r74plguhgn@cqs5fzplfk5i>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Provide !COMMON_CLK dummy for devm_clk_rate_exclusive_get()
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, kernel@pengutronix.de
To: Uwe =?utf-8?q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:20:33 -0700
User-Agent: alot/0.10

Quoting Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6nig (2024-04-19 13:00:19)
> Hello Stephen,
>=20
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 10:49:35PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K=EF=BF=BDnig wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 03:35:57PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Quoting Uwe Kleine-K=EF=BF=BDnig (2024-03-27 00:33:10)
> > > > To be able to compile drivers using devm_clk_rate_exclusive_get() a=
lso
> > > > on platforms without the common clk framework, add a dummy
> > > > implementation that does the same as clk_rate_exclusive_get() in th=
at
> > > > case (i.e. nothing).
> > > >=20
> > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403270305.ydvX9xq1=
-lkp@intel.com/
> > > > Fixes: b0cde62e4c54 ("clk: Add a devm variant of clk_rate_exclusive=
_get()")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K=EF=BF=BDnig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutroni=
x.de>
> > > > ---
> > >=20
> > > Applied to clk-fixes
> >=20
> > I assume that means it will be sent to Linus before 6.9? That would be
> > great because I want to make use of this function in some drivers and
> > the build bots nag about my for-next branch that in some configurations
> > this function is missing.

Yes.

>=20
> Gentle ping. I'd like to get the patches I intend to send to Linus for
> v6.10-rc1 into shape. To have these unmodified in my for-next branch for
> some time it would be great to know your plans for the clk-fixes branch. =

> Alternatively: Can I expect the commit not to be changed any more and
> pull it into my pwm tree?
>=20

clk-fixes is sent to Linus during the rc cycle. I'm sending a PR today.