Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-152031-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
From: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>,
	Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
	Ajay Kaher <ajay.kaher@broadcom.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	samuel.holland@sifive.com,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 08/24] drivers/perf: riscv: Fix counter mask iteration for RV32
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 08:17:24 -0700
Message-Id: <20240420151741.962500-9-atishp@rivosinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240420151741.962500-1-atishp@rivosinc.com>
References: <20240420151741.962500-1-atishp@rivosinc.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

For RV32, used_hw_ctrs can have more than 1 word if the firmware chooses
to interleave firmware/hardware counters indicies. Even though it's a
unlikely scenario, handle that case by iterating over all the words
instead of just using the first word.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
---
 drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
index f23501898657..4eacd89141a9 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
@@ -652,10 +652,12 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_all(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
 static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_hw_ctrs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events);
+	int i;
 
-	/* No need to check the error here as we can't do anything about the error */
-	sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_STOP, 0,
-		  cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[0], 0, 0, 0, 0);
+	for (i = 0; i < BITS_TO_LONGS(RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS); i++)
+		/* No need to check the error here as we can't do anything about the error */
+		sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_STOP, i * BITS_PER_LONG,
+			  cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[i], 0, 0, 0, 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -667,7 +669,7 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_hw_ctrs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
 static inline void pmu_sbi_start_overflow_mask(struct riscv_pmu *pmu,
 					       unsigned long ctr_ovf_mask)
 {
-	int idx = 0;
+	int idx = 0, i;
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events);
 	struct perf_event *event;
 	unsigned long flag = SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_SET_INIT_VALUE;
@@ -676,11 +678,12 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_start_overflow_mask(struct riscv_pmu *pmu,
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc;
 	u64 init_val = 0;
 
-	ctr_start_mask = cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[0] & ~ctr_ovf_mask;
-
-	/* Start all the counters that did not overflow in a single shot */
-	sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_START, 0, ctr_start_mask,
-		  0, 0, 0, 0);
+	for (i = 0; i < BITS_TO_LONGS(RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS); i++) {
+		ctr_start_mask = cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[i] & ~ctr_ovf_mask;
+		/* Start all the counters that did not overflow in a single shot */
+		sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_START, i * BITS_PER_LONG, ctr_start_mask,
+			0, 0, 0, 0);
+	}
 
 	/* Reinitialize and start all the counter that overflowed */
 	while (ctr_ovf_mask) {
-- 
2.34.1