Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-152948-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 10:13:50 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	tony.luck@intel.com, x86@kernel.org, Avadhut.Naik@amd.com,
	John.Allen@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/16] x86/mce: Define mce_setup() helpers for common
 and per-CPU fields
Message-ID: <20240422081350.GBZiYcPme1Xx1RRqhp@fat_crate.local>
References: <20240404151359.47970-1-yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
 <20240404151359.47970-2-yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
 <20240416100206.GEZh5MnlDJMeaERfQ5@fat_crate.local>
 <b5ecdc56-11c6-47b0-9cc1-87d384b01d0f@amd.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b5ecdc56-11c6-47b0-9cc1-87d384b01d0f@amd.com>

On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 09:50:58AM -0400, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> Should I send another revision of this entire set? Or should I split out
> the mce_setup() patches?

I leave it up to you.

If it makes sense to keep it all together then wait for me to go through
the rest first and send a whole new set or if you want to break this
out, that's fine too.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette