Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-152973-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 11:26:38 +0300 (EEST)
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
To: Ismael Luceno <iluceno@suse.de>
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Firo Yang <firo.yang@suse.com>,
        Andreas Taschner <andreas.taschner@suse.com>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Michal_Kube=C4=8Dek?= <mkubecek@suse.com>,
        Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
        netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        coreteam@netfilter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ipvs: Fix checksumming on GSO of SCTP packets
In-Reply-To: <20240421142234.15764-1-iluceno@suse.de>
Message-ID: <5a1b5536-a8ba-4438-9ed2-23819f1846a6@ssi.bg>
References: <20240421142234.15764-1-iluceno@suse.de>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="-1463811672-2077803110-1713774400=:25471"

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

---1463811672-2077803110-1713774400=:25471
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT


	Hello,

On Sun, 21 Apr 2024, Ismael Luceno wrote:

> It was observed in the wild that pairs of consecutive packets would leave
> the IPVS with the same wrong checksum, and the issue only went away when
> disabling GSO.
> 
> IPVS needs to avoid computing the SCTP checksum when using GSO.
> 
> Fixes: 90017accff61 ("sctp: Add GSO support", 2016-06-02)
> Co-developed-by: Firo Yang <firo.yang@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ismael Luceno <iluceno@suse.de>
> Tested-by: Andreas Taschner <andreas.taschner@suse.com>
> CC: Michal Kubeček <mkubecek@suse.com>
> CC: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
> CC: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
> CC: lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org
> CC: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
> CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> CC: coreteam@netfilter.org

	Looks good to me, thanks!

Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>

	As scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict /tmp/file.patch complains
about Co-developed-by and Signed-off-by lines you may want to
send v3...

> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     Changes since v1:
>     * Added skb_is_gso before skb_is_gso_sctp.
>     * Added "Fixes" tag.
> 
>  net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> index a0921adc31a9..1e689c714127 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> @@ -126,7 +126,8 @@ sctp_snat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
>  	if (sctph->source != cp->vport || payload_csum ||
>  	    skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
>  		sctph->source = cp->vport;
> -		sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
> +		if (!skb_is_gso(skb) || !skb_is_gso_sctp(skb))
> +			sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
>  	} else {
>  		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
>  	}
> @@ -174,7 +175,8 @@ sctp_dnat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
>  	    (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL &&
>  	     !(skb_dst(skb)->dev->features & NETIF_F_SCTP_CRC))) {
>  		sctph->dest = cp->dport;
> -		sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
> +		if (!skb_is_gso(skb) || !skb_is_gso_sctp(skb))
> +			sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
>  	} else if (skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
>  		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.43.0

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
---1463811672-2077803110-1713774400=:25471--