Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754109AbYAYUYw (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:24:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759752AbYAYUYG (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:24:06 -0500 Received: from idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca ([24.71.223.10]:61457 "EHLO pd4mo3so.prod.shaw.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759615AbYAYUX7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:23:59 -0500 Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:47:39 -0700 From: Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: [RFC] ext3: per-process soft-syncing data=ordered mode In-reply-to: <200801242336.00340.a1426z@gawab.com> To: Al Boldi Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mail-followup-to: Al Boldi , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-id: <20080125064739.GS18433@webber.adilger.int> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline X-GPG-Key: 1024D/0D35BED6 X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7A37 5D79 BF1B CECA D44F 8A29 A488 39F5 0D35 BED6 References: <200801242336.00340.a1426z@gawab.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1433 Lines: 33 On Jan 24, 2008 23:36 +0300, Al Boldi wrote: > data=ordered mode has proven reliable over the years, and it does this by > ordering filedata flushes before metadata flushes. But this sometimes > causes contention in the order of a 10x slowdown for certain apps, either > due to the misuse of fsync or due to inherent behaviour like db's, as well > as inherent starvation issues exposed by the data=ordered mode. > > data=writeback mode alleviates data=order mode slowdowns, but only works > per-mount and is too dangerous to run as a default mode. > > This RFC proposes to introduce a tunable which allows to disable fsync and > changes ordered into writeback writeout on a per-process basis like this: > > echo 1 > /proc/`pidof process`/softsync If fsync performance is an issue for you, run the filesystem in data=journal mode, put the journal on a separate disk and make it big enough that you don't block on it to flush the data to the filesystem (but not so big that it is consuming all of your RAM). That keeps your data guarantees without hurting performance. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/