Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-153609-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJg=8jyuSxDL6XvqEXY_66M20psRK2J53oBTP+fjV5xpW2-R6w@mail.gmail.com>
 <uekqafv4wx5axijnnfybnxixui3ruzy3mkxirflv7tb3ovrtbk@ounqurycykuv>
In-Reply-To: <uekqafv4wx5axijnnfybnxixui3ruzy3mkxirflv7tb3ovrtbk@ounqurycykuv>
From: Marius Fleischer <fleischermarius@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 08:11:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJg=8jzRT=oA9g6AGd1KmAY3GBkKkczj1rCqQ+pik5LmUQYd_A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: general protection fault in mas_empty_area_rev
To: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, maple-tree@lists.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller@googlegroups.com, 
	harrisonmichaelgreen@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi Liam,

Thank you so much for the response!

> >
> > Crash log:
> >
> > general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address
> > 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI
> >
> > KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007]
> >
> > CPU: 0 PID: 79545 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4-dirty #3
>
> This indicates that you built with your own patches.  Could you test an
> unmodified 6.9.0-rc4 with your setup?
>

I'm very sorry for this oversight. I had applied the patches for another bug
from this conversation
(https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240404070702.2744-3-osalvador@suse.de/T/#m480f21ab850996395082d0faab7f624f45b83781)
I will test the reproducer without these patches and get back to you!

If there is any other information I can provide to help you, please let me know!

Wishing you a lovely start to the week!

Best,
Marius