Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-153930-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 22:43:45 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
To: Johan Adolfsson <Johan.Adolfsson@axis.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>, 
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>, Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com>, 
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>, 
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>, 
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, 
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>, 
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, 
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, kernel <kernel@axis.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/panel: panel-simple: Add generic panel-dsi driver
Message-ID: <dn33u6orierkw3skh3mymkc3u77wn2cbpqs7rznyndnku7txr7@2lvvxudsvda7>
References: <20240418-foo-fix-v1-0-461bcc8f5976@axis.com>
 <20240418-foo-fix-v1-1-461bcc8f5976@axis.com>
 <76b46467-6a27-4f07-8a3e-cdd51e2e28bb@linaro.org>
 <PAWPR02MB9281557BDDA960812412E0D59B122@PAWPR02MB9281.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <PAWPR02MB9281557BDDA960812412E0D59B122@PAWPR02MB9281.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>

On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 02:05:01PM +0000, Johan Adolfsson wrote:
> Hi,
> Sorry for delayed response, still investigating why these mails didn't reach my inbox as expected..
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> 
> Sent: den 19 april 2024 01:06
> To: Johan Adolfsson <Johan.Adolfsson@axis.com>; Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>; Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com>; Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>; Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>; Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>; Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>; David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>; Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>; Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>; Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; kernel <kernel@axis.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/panel: panel-simple: Add generic panel-dsi driver
> 
> On 18/04/2024 16:01, Johan Adolfsson wrote:
> > Add generic panel-dsi panel, similar to panel-dpi that can have it's 
> > timing, lanes and flags overridden by devicetree.
> > Add some dev_err() and dev_warn() calls.
> > 
> 
> ...
> 
> >>  		/* sentinel */
> >>  	}
> >> @@ -4992,17 +5051,28 @@ static int panel_simple_dsi_probe(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
> >>  		return -ENODEV;
> >>  
> >>  	err = panel_simple_probe(&dsi->dev, &desc->desc);
> >> +	if (err)
> >> +		dev_err(&dsi->dev, "%s: err %i\n", __func__, err);
> 
> >This looks like debugging code.
> I added it since you don't really get any good hints on where things fails if they do it.
> Debugging code or not depends on the definition I guess - it helps the user track down a faulty devicetree,
> or as in the case below mismatch with the DSI driver.
> 
> ...
> >>  	dsi->format = desc->format;
> >>  	dsi->lanes = desc->lanes;
> >> +	of_property_read_u32(dsi->dev.of_node, "lanes", &dsi->lanes);
> >
> >Is this defined in the binding?
> 
> Apparently not which I assumed. Other bindings mentions dsi-lanes, but I guess "num-dsi-lanes" would be more correct.

Please use drm_of_get_data_lanes_count() and corresponding property from
the bindings.
> 
> >>  	err = mipi_dsi_attach(dsi);
> >>  	if (err) {
> >>  		struct panel_simple *panel = mipi_dsi_get_drvdata(dsi);
> >>  
> >> +		dev_err(&dsi->dev, "probe attach err: %i", err);
> >
> >Do not introduce unrelated code changes.
> 
> As before, it helps the user who has a messed up devicetree find out, since we now gets some more configurability using devicetree.
> Would it be acceptable as a separate commit, or should I simply skip this?
> 
> 
> >Best regards,
> >Krzysztof
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Best regards
> /Johan
> 
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry