Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-153981-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 22:07:23 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Parthiban Veerasooran <Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, saeedm@nvidia.com,
	anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, horatiu.vultur@microchip.com,
	ruanjinjie@huawei.com, steen.hegelund@microchip.com,
	vladimir.oltean@nxp.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
	Thorsten.Kummermehr@microchip.com, Pier.Beruto@onsemi.com,
	Selvamani.Rajagopal@onsemi.com, Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com,
	benjamin.bigler@bernformulastudent.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 00/12] Add support for OPEN Alliance
 10BASE-T1x MACPHY Serial Interface
Message-ID: <2526cd6a-2300-47f2-bf94-3c697dda87e0@lunn.ch>
References: <20240418125648.372526-1-Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240418125648.372526-1-Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com>

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 06:26:36PM +0530, Parthiban Veerasooran wrote:
> This patch series contain the below updates,
> - Adds support for OPEN Alliance 10BASE-T1x MACPHY Serial Interface in the
>   net/ethernet/oa_tc6.c.
>   Link to the spec:
>   -----------------
>   https://opensig.org/download/document/OPEN_Alliance_10BASET1x_MAC-PHY_Serial_Interface_V1.1.pdf
> 
> - Adds driver support for Microchip LAN8650/1 Rev.B1 10BASE-T1S MACPHY
>   Ethernet driver in the net/ethernet/microchip/lan865x/lan865x.c.
>   Link to the product:
>   --------------------
>   https://www.microchip.com/en-us/product/lan8650

I will get around to reviewing this soon, i promise.

To the OnSemi people: Have you tried your driver/device using this
framework? It would be good to have a second vendors device using it,
just to show no vendor specific code has slipped into the framework.

Thanks
	Andrew