Received: by 2002:ab2:6203:0:b0:1f5:f2ab:c469 with SMTP id o3csp2607015lqt; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:27:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCX4pcKEe1xY4R9WTrJyR0EyjYxyLySaidm0hJcRtUOV9kV6dRTHBlwMIwyVDs2BXX+PRMkC3K+bmZAyLtgBy9skOqCx+/VeckOOBXJopg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEQXX0DkZWGJqrkysVMB0tlJIB9pXbJW5ca0YC2SoesJvi358MWl0HfHkB5L/8nBfyppuI3 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:6a12:b0:1ac:de6e:a7f1 with SMTP id p18-20020a056a206a1200b001acde6ea7f1mr11327976pzk.3.1713828473123; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:27:53 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from sy.mirrors.kernel.org (sy.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ei24-20020a056a0080d800b006e7a30eb18csi8389180pfb.281.2024.04.22.16.27.52 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:27:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-154176-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=lAIVaEfI; arc=fail (signature failed); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-154176-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-154176-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sy.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B329B21293 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 23:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBBC44597F; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 23:01:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="lAIVaEfI" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D41ED45942; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 23:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 ARC-Seal:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713826895; cv=fail; b=HWcQ+pB7XnXnapBVPuF/xtNiQ+hA9vUHNZ3hIfbxiKYuwf6vOiCYyeWPRHNjIjbsDqc0ipMwGgPEffVFezkBIiEVbshzFA6U+jkRiHVDFXseNhpVArTlodDe3iIFItiGrQKbI9Y5DR25QZ8QgiWe0CphKgfa4d3Ik6Rg+I4h/dI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713826895; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ItodQKyDDAN0JpEhclCd2S3UYR1HCLNKreA2aZTyiAI=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:References:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version; b=rIBMWVyGaY4AvA9iUevV4JUexlTNeGGhtuPJRZWTTZB8yw5D+NkDB2gsrBkzhvi51nJpMZlsDWyTWWBXo9FRswI1iqeqkY9iJvW6TnR4J1eF7pEWNPr0Eb7/3kCcf3Crk1KFklF4++sFod6jg4+/yO/dOOjtxk+DNjQ638a+gBE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=2; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=lAIVaEfI; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1713826894; x=1745362894; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=ItodQKyDDAN0JpEhclCd2S3UYR1HCLNKreA2aZTyiAI=; b=lAIVaEfI94D0kYUBaUyJPpZNsZP8pv16q7qyqySrmGg1GojH9vvTI5qW AwPZXZeKACP20JtcdQiubEJCFKXf24WnG8tdlgGv+9hoQlGuHn3+26uJA G8ZLf4jOKnMGnScbxO7N3rqDW7IpqJHlKMaTqTjLrahEFPkaZGjskscze /FgCvFc5FKdR835LnpPRVyGQ5QKcK9bUheiQf+m6Dlpt29HSiFRqHM4ES mGxui5Ebzb2zr3Y0oIvYQZ+LEG5S7h1yMlESNbzEwBhzlc283yxbqwICg nlJgZKWQuiXC5MFrBSsczo935It/rwPT0Aw1q0JFZviJaaYz+K96QA66d w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: nvn0RkwcRIaffYzOWqOP7A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 8idseX2+S6K8Sz3xevW9Fg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11052"; a="9930785" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,221,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="9930785" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by fmvoesa110.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Apr 2024 16:01:33 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: WDMH3RohQf6N0bzGiOZg9w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: BffENRBCSu685iUZF+iOlA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,221,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="28679539" Received: from orsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.229.16]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Apr 2024 16:01:33 -0700 Received: from orsmsx610.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.23) by ORSMSX603.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:01:32 -0700 Received: from ORSEDG602.ED.cps.intel.com (10.7.248.7) by orsmsx610.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:01:32 -0700 Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.55.100) by edgegateway.intel.com (134.134.137.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:01:31 -0700 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=blVXdF7OECvFYzh0qiQ70stktOGL6ghw5Q3iC0fJNbkU6Oq+jmEhSlvqCQK7EEJakfxi/HeJU+wV0YpU07r11sXTL9Wf7l6R18C9iiBZm/bp0+PzalEoEjsThEtBvQJVuj/0PVGQbR5P+uIC6lTuqhVYFOr+zzcZaddUvPv7o2wvA+8NLCsp2NGP+mNsWMR9zXQsrK1Gl1UU5yrW4hD6oUT3ZhxBwsX9gsazcDwaLOrG1X+c+NEX+zIwOXIvQ85PjJ8IHX1XYRDqVv9cOeJHNFM2c3lr7w7BtY5fYWoJDgS2r8OKCj0mlMNpMa23VA3EGJT/pdMU0sS2iMhP13/s9Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=TZkAh+9kShrTg+qQtGlhbwenip+2GilmrCWmBqTva5w=; b=iE8/8K4oPtFn2bZnNg2yCpsUA663ORxXOFbVbDBnSiELSuL8B+tJuUqTIbvdAyn6FLQ6Z31gG6Eo4qCinT492r2txtsMTu3RkcxiybESLEXHg606ewooUccAejZaNoHI5HfCRsDxZRcitjmlvOxxH7XTunyktm+Ou7jlyD7KXyhf0kgJZJbQLqrKOhHe6wkDzxqFfEmGjegKgTuBebv976Z9cCJyBLMrU8S/IqHcSzUGZslEyGiLuPKMcFi5KCASH+RC/X/mzREq0cEgB4PpWNqw7pmHmd2fRUafSMfmsXgchIU9uIb37ud7G80P/cFQ+aeCKVvO0HZ6XQX85UvHNA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=intel.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com; arc=none Authentication-Results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=intel.com; Received: from PH8PR11MB8107.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:256::6) by CY5PR11MB6186.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:930:26::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7519.21; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 23:01:24 +0000 Received: from PH8PR11MB8107.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::82fd:75df:40d7:ed71]) by PH8PR11MB8107.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::82fd:75df:40d7:ed71%4]) with mapi id 15.20.7452.046; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 23:01:24 +0000 Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:01:21 -0700 From: Dan Williams To: "Li, Ming" , Dan Williams , Terry Bowman , CC: , Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/6] PCI/AER: Enable RCEC to report internal error for CXL root port Message-ID: <6626ec41da372_690a294df@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> References: <20240313083602.239201-1-ming4.li@intel.com> <20240313083602.239201-4-ming4.li@intel.com> <7172ec2f-7cba-460b-a6c6-9fff45ba938b@amd.com> <91ddd182-cc71-480f-a1b2-e7c31b29a549@amd.com> <662134e290d89_5eec229450@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch> <8a304a97-7825-4b02-a716-f25d0e9d4718@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8a304a97-7825-4b02-a716-f25d0e9d4718@intel.com> X-ClientProxiedBy: SJ0PR05CA0203.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:330::28) To PH8PR11MB8107.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:256::6) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: PH8PR11MB8107:EE_|CY5PR11MB6186:EE_ X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 7a79838d-b8c2-4b61-049c-08dc63202217 X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;ARA:13230031|1800799015|376005|366007; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: =?us-ascii?Q?ANQbWXs87URVx05ZWvefvrnDmrDXMxLDwNLCA6Pa5WhUat2ObAiZ+3JKxLcw?= =?us-ascii?Q?1/CKbHbj/A8UvYmtKeSM4QUFlzA9bWYHJuOd/pqesjz8SiEXg74syhopCKl7?= =?us-ascii?Q?HAG7E81HeCTr0kPGPiemT7EuKzqPYMT39EUjZVyJga+Prs8mKBVI8ZJt/23p?= =?us-ascii?Q?PcTmYJsuRQCY7NQyW4TgqWsI5jvENvuj+Wb8EuJyhzeLORXSvzgq478W8jv9?= =?us-ascii?Q?fAyUDm7eollKg9uAkdqOl6fhEsbm34haJ2hsqRRtxd9NpxOzLUyt5+cGaJZz?= =?us-ascii?Q?7OP4mTlRwfMc7SUT4YgXhkAZBVAg7k3xXsmrwXrY2e0s+fa9IeB8vO8rNiyn?= =?us-ascii?Q?XAwrgG2bUl0upBUhN0pSXvly2L0IbHGybQEqBH5fHbdLWr3fhsm96IkNopsU?= =?us-ascii?Q?XWTPGN05qQcDXhwdUxl9rDF1hodUqpL+3eq06YjN1tKLuIO/DIXlCL84rN9b?= =?us-ascii?Q?H/yoTQewEzxy541a+apDYU24YwBxPfC361XprOXOTRhaIC1toOvDy9s0z4ES?= =?us-ascii?Q?lQDwxDyvx7msGPKp3d8711+bM2Gsp4yxDCxW1hZgMruxyeYkAsiUExY+yA7P?= =?us-ascii?Q?7CD8ien4QiD14yTyo66uatIHZ39a86iEaMiLysH2IB2jA2hkegNepTsPIaBn?= =?us-ascii?Q?+pza6Aw/j1z+cgmzBOoAm++T28PVr8Z7kHJNmXBjDOO1OzSu2M+aQ6JrqU/o?= =?us-ascii?Q?wWKpOEmAkATekYmJYR0vCILViTBJIeKYLBNyWOsFueOT1ZHximldbxApKaOz?= =?us-ascii?Q?xbcMFYV0Qx1OYo7kcSOfGZpRnxqFWGcKzDDDDlPWPNHhjVWuvseleiOTkODn?= =?us-ascii?Q?FLuGT4RjPemzrGFYXGxD3FRXFO5egXHA7+4YiYMVyRlDDbsOzgPMzZKX0krN?= =?us-ascii?Q?N5tCdKSwFaqk/+6mV9hNzLi4KrUgMRt+vUWkupGCtXL+MoB/5gwxc4j1b63j?= =?us-ascii?Q?G9SuM7Ex96288yvb7fmpXlkkrTqTNIoFZihWcmqtjnTdwDLNivVGxw0hKlje?= =?us-ascii?Q?0X0uPAYoloUNS+PMxegtxkGpI2hvW+yapbEez6R/hUMcx26k3OxZjHP1bJM2?= =?us-ascii?Q?+RfPwlYwjYlWvMy3Xu5wJbfg0ek+a/0vz3YQrWpoiONx802Xr/Wc7hmfqBU0?= =?us-ascii?Q?0QnJP+DSBkRv5Pf+8fqAGu2oYfOqmyV7/cRhWxdYWkNuW3BTFUvrY0X4XMjF?= =?us-ascii?Q?+/XLBbgZFW1s2iIzNfUFL3jJoOrrVi6rBnfW68jlCU6KteNMPquUJnuF80mj?= =?us-ascii?Q?yOZIOqygiuOmeYAGtnkukvoyNHyNluOoDCBz1JYMMA=3D=3D?= X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255;CTRY:;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:PH8PR11MB8107.namprd11.prod.outlook.com;PTR:;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230031)(1800799015)(376005)(366007);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: =?us-ascii?Q?4E4P3nqS51dQXFIKaUtQ6ITgdJKez25hH6D4BCvXgNu3/BLztzJiFtkN3ufL?= =?us-ascii?Q?w0JaysQG7l8r/RRCI8xIuWIFA8lOcWfHPCpriOqWvE0D+KLSlWdFR7/xeqhD?= =?us-ascii?Q?4w+QD/eycvo8b7lUWVxVgctY3FsmduHSBw1mQazidJQ8988REqnDm7ea9m+k?= =?us-ascii?Q?KTFnhOQZEFITn7h/6910bMfNwOROW8s4YIbb6aRtedgFuWeCspAhmXQjOo2N?= =?us-ascii?Q?08ZO5ZXg+hSpE7cUoQOOSyybGqD2iMG/svXdiTVmA4zoIEURR71pGI67dNz+?= =?us-ascii?Q?LrJouL9nFL3sy/3EpZClWVPUwNJiFZy0zhZBC6rVOd9mQF5aBc51s6U5IZUY?= =?us-ascii?Q?u04XfCw955FJjhT6s4bO7is6GNbip2cYsy78NcvpBazfqagkVWPvXMfdrOL9?= =?us-ascii?Q?bHzPBk0NCL1Itd17uEnFkXHWlN4K6spvRrQRl6IpNdi+DfBD5kRU9dXzxKWM?= =?us-ascii?Q?P3EY1eqOBjdDKv74CWtonYt0F6NKXN3EwIHt+TRWO8dJfvWFqY4+kgWcnDQx?= =?us-ascii?Q?FPmg/5k7mFp9dCaFbTL3Qi0A/NMIQNIgkwUd24Yuec7Dxe8EV1vQbMQAYaPd?= =?us-ascii?Q?mpwS2a7u/VNTmiD7JS49Z99D+uyjgrh09RTvxbd6A4zsIQLgMhxx1wa4KPBZ?= =?us-ascii?Q?ljDuv9vj9bkbbuJb3nRC1ZEY+mXtJ5SziDq7BgXa/ty6r0kI2CtU9hjORvAi?= =?us-ascii?Q?7WI1Jy2yJCDmQlKTQCaNp6AdLRA/JX6uvOM+9xi1ePsSILc4o57Rhpp488fk?= =?us-ascii?Q?AsLoTdVuaAQUFLWTYwqAMEQvGDyWU9CRxPur9DEKQbwp0ogEQu2uTXvJu2e0?= =?us-ascii?Q?bymOy6pQOozIoH/4kkVEcgz5cX3qT3p5U8UKaTBxbAA3zPlKtrzxpasAPIYa?= =?us-ascii?Q?255f9fwaI+G56fL6IKnZPqs+W4Wg4D8MuS8orjgfOtdLQIhUpIxhaTGC1VRA?= =?us-ascii?Q?m1o0oebVUQZzVOQF++Me/cV7tLO8tH1PopqVHcbr1hYnWbW5Gma0DPSj0YXa?= =?us-ascii?Q?zbLxSA3QW3MXC8TJo0UBb3YnxOybS6Qi5knKYCpvigjgPxMoU3+Kto2b3kU3?= =?us-ascii?Q?HUPLVD1fpxlW3DpJg0fGrI+13hSELj6F8s3yE7G3Pp8TGRZ0nT8Jk8QmKpzx?= =?us-ascii?Q?OmzRKx+TS0qdrG6fzggFyyp32FlQqRL4A43zHcYyuHBiVfUzJ2EtLyL7BNie?= =?us-ascii?Q?J5C2nW4NyV7kMHndjnYA2jkzF6uL0PWM7BJL4FlebhMBW2grw/0Bzx+gfYpG?= =?us-ascii?Q?CnwyIo68gdna5+8HZLtRLQg04G7qFoMqbdICNSnDkp1Z8MfCA4K6MDw7uwZA?= =?us-ascii?Q?BsU49ezIxj/wpgePJkRzgvSE+CeVvG/bgtk+tapRZUYhUgr0sIfidJdYiFII?= =?us-ascii?Q?TVRU6Wn2X5ufWQAQtO+Zzhz+W2Ato2wMj+A5AdnRbMn1eZVYHLQXeLyrw0Hd?= =?us-ascii?Q?XTEXN6cZcs7Zj8pW04ru9+a0Wp5HshIXRyXIaOgubyceEtjaOqByahD8XoMk?= =?us-ascii?Q?w7lutB00IExIk4nSkXSG78vr3p+LTeIClYQCd65nIoIKbROeqShQIbg7Ckpa?= =?us-ascii?Q?9Rxl3ch7DccPrCnyU8TQSkXhIDUc9kD/z6B0Pi8GZlX0dIBZPjCpS6pRZ7yT?= =?us-ascii?Q?nw=3D=3D?= X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 7a79838d-b8c2-4b61-049c-08dc63202217 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: PH8PR11MB8107.namprd11.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Apr 2024 23:01:24.3213 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 46c98d88-e344-4ed4-8496-4ed7712e255d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: WORKsLYFcQE9QG0Gsc+I/InZf8MR0B6xcPyA5HPLq+EPJd8eMzPhc6KeeIy/zJV73nt8xOmWNjyXjUaacO/olgfIR9FuJV7pE3sTzwl7m9s= X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY5PR11MB6186 X-OriginatorOrg: intel.com Li, Ming wrote: > On 4/18/2024 10:57 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > > Li, Ming wrote: > >> On 4/16/2024 10:46 PM, Terry Bowman wrote: > >>> The driver support is much simpler if RCEC does not handle VH protocol errors. Is there > >>> a reason to forward root port VH mode protocol errors to an RCEC rather than consume > >>> in the root port's AER driver and forward to CXL error handler? > >>> > >> I agree that is simpler if only root port handle VH protocol errors, > >> but I think that software has no chance to choose if VH protocol > >> errors reported to RCEC or root port, it depends on platform > >> implementation. So I think we should support both cases. > > > > The question is whether the CXL spec RDPAS behavior causes any problems > > for platforms that follow PCIe rather than CXL reporting flows for > > root-port errors. I.e. does it cause problems if Linux starts scanning > > root ports on RCEC notifications? > > > > I do think the lookup needs to change to be based on CXL host-bridge > > detection and not CXL-type-3 endpoint detection, but otherwise it looks > > like CXL spec wants to invalidate PCIe spec expectations. > > Hi Dan, if my understanding is correct, the CXL host-bridge detection > you mentioned is that iterating all root ports under RCEC associated > bus range for RCEC reported VH protocol errors case, and the > CXL-type-3 detection is that iterating all CXL-type-3 endpoint under > RCEC associated bus range. is it right? I think this error checking needs to be tightly scoped to only scan for CXL.cachemem errors and not CXL.io or typical PCIe errors. That way we are not technically running afoul of the PCIe expectations that *PCIe* root-port errors are only reported by their local AER block and not an RCEC. So the scanning should be limited to just the root-ports that have negotiated a CXL.cachemem link.