Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-155242-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 16:02:30 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ACPI: Declare acpi_blacklisted() only if CONFIG_X86
 is enabled
Message-ID: <ZiexZnmbLqPy11d1@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20240407063341.3710801-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
 <CAJZ5v0hqt6+1AvDWb0BYw0z9burVQfdkOF1qUGzRRuPmvq4qQg@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0hqt6+1AvDWb0BYw0z9burVQfdkOF1qUGzRRuPmvq4qQg@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 06:37:59PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 8:33 AM Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
> <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> wrote:

..

> Applied (as 6.10 material), but it looks to me like this declaration
> could be moved away from this header file at all, as the function is
> only used in one place in arch-x86 code.

Yes, we probably may move it to asm/acpi.h for x86.

I don't remember if I ever expressed that idea, but I definitely was thinking
about this.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko