Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-155480-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Message-ID: <a8238354-c36e-4dcb-88ba-1417adc44245@fiberby.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:31:39 +0000
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: flower: validate
 control flags
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
 Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>,
 Ravi Gunasekaran <r-gunasekaran@ti.com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>,
 linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
References: <20240422152656.175627-1-ast@fiberby.net>
 <ZiewT6N2fjhFwrpW@nanopsycho>
Content-Language: en-US
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Asbj=C3=B8rn_Sloth_T=C3=B8nnesen?= <ast@fiberby.net>
In-Reply-To: <ZiewT6N2fjhFwrpW@nanopsycho>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi Jiri,

Thank you for the reviews.

On 4/23/24 12:57 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Next time, could you please bundle similar/related patches into
> a patchset?

Sure, I did it per driver to make it easier to handle differences in
get_maintainer output and be able to integrate feedback into later patches
for other drivers, and since the patches could be applied individually.
When I started I through that more drivers had their own trees, wasn't
aware that it was only Intel, and that mlx5-next was dead.
For instance the feedback from Jianbo on mlx5 patch, also went into the
octeontx2-pf patch.

I only have one patch left in the queue now (for qede).

-- 
Best regards
Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
Network Engineer
Fiberby - AS42541