Received: by 2002:ab2:6203:0:b0:1f5:f2ab:c469 with SMTP id o3csp3041112lqt; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 08:51:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCWreY1YE3PcMnZwZ+hiQ0SQ6KxTjJ6ntSfQFG38EQOwbJpBX93Uf0mTzProUZoz3CD3iz1K5ykgbvfvW6RJxpSqWCetSgzXjMFArqq6RQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE3ptnjwtVpKr41GGmrk9JWWhnwB8cbwsqlhbTpDcBcGccawQD6Gg1yPJ47Ld/YGBv9YpG+ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1403:b0:3c6:382:126a with SMTP id w3-20020a056808140300b003c60382126amr18252303oiv.30.1713887473877; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 08:51:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n7-20020a05622a040700b00439e0bb8d01si2700294qtx.653.2024.04.23.08.51.13 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 23 Apr 2024 08:51:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-155500-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=lXUvLLBF; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-155500-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-155500-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 883431C22C91 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:51:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7714B13C9D2; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="lXUvLLBF" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0EF213C687; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:51:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713887466; cv=none; b=pgwpHgTz9/0DavcSukvmO/BDEg+6ahgVMFiMe2yZWMyApNoUFrPkSpFwW1zJyv/JAQb7N4dHE+90et+czJDj6mKILq0nCXtxa7f9Va5vVQhvNPjKlHf340dnyNfqHu1oQVHu8/LH0SUPivGxZrDlowM3j4lPEB129IKrEC0tkvI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713887466; c=relaxed/simple; bh=z7DVv/KkP0dGz/VhOP+VvIGaEuWWXNTb5smFe7rSOdw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dFZTmyDYZ+grEfuvYHAPzQ0W1TpTlMfX+FVarExtCgvDmvclyCR4NGRnuMYZp7swWLziqL9+9INPsl+wzqE4ypaENJtCCv0VT0spSK331C2zKz0Q4HpOFJhFEeaWnnsXOIfUoODjLNlXya6MorNxUDF7fYG4hVuoC0Y0FuEf56I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=lXUvLLBF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1713887465; x=1745423465; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=z7DVv/KkP0dGz/VhOP+VvIGaEuWWXNTb5smFe7rSOdw=; b=lXUvLLBFfqs5MNKNuMmwqF/mzIbCkmGGRWngmrCOdlZW3cBRg1bwHu5s DcgyQ/GjSdvVZafvK+Ws4t91pHLkahheSDoQA29qh8NOPqiSzSDC0qaMr DpMkn7LxoNtF4W4gSrJOLn9KUrVc1TDwRJX0JWED6gOwfLipFrktl0G8s VdyQ040SO03vEQUXd6imQGJHkOOzO8QdH/iQxwayP2wX9ct8Tp0WM6bZA f8xUgmypsSvZmXQJDYxZaAvyYM1WZ7qFy6dO4Vdie/jcOAAnq544/aaG0 s5/vKtLSoqL+FYFru6o/b53QtHY1IWJ5/zh0lZzfyxcYe7n6HTKjAf9ms g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: upnJW5JnThmR94M+yRSHLA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: u1GoaUqSTnW6wszU+FUtpQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11053"; a="26996764" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,222,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="26996764" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by fmvoesa102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Apr 2024 08:50:33 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: dvEBwkTqQ7qEUsgrdlBkGg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 1ClGcYjvQLCS3keGPg/Cjw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,222,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="24447401" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmviesa007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Apr 2024 08:50:30 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rzIPb-00000000Nig-1SkB; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:50:27 +0300 Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:50:27 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: nuno.sa@analog.com Cc: Petr Mladek , Chris Down , John Ogness , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jonathan Cameron , Lars-Peter Clausen , Olivier Moysan , Andi Shyti , Jyoti Bhayana , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] iio: common: scmi_iio: convert to dev_err_probe() Message-ID: References: <20240423-dev-add_dev_errp_probe-v2-0-12f43c5d8b0d@analog.com> <20240423-dev-add_dev_errp_probe-v2-4-12f43c5d8b0d@analog.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240423-dev-add_dev_errp_probe-v2-4-12f43c5d8b0d@analog.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 05:20:33PM +0200, Nuno Sa via B4 Relay wrote: > From: Nuno Sa > > Make use of dev_err_probe() and dev_err_ptr_probe() to simplify error paths > during probe. .. > + return dev_err_ptr_probe(&iiodev->dev, ret, > + "Error in registering sensor update notifier for sensor %s err %d", \n > + sensor->sensor_info->name, ret); .. > + return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, > + "SCMI sensor %d has missing info\n", i); One line? (It's 99 if you use relaxed limit). .. > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scmi_iio_dev), > + "failed to allocate IIO device for sensor %s: %ld\n", > + sensor_info->name, PTR_ERR(scmi_iio_dev)); Please, be sure you remove double error code printing, dev_err_probe() does it for you already. (This applies to all places like this, if any, in the entire series.) .. > + return dev_err_probe(dev, err, > + "IIO buffer setup error at sensor %s: %d\n", > + sensor_info->name, err); Ditto. .. > + return dev_err_probe(dev, err, > + "IIO device registration failed at sensor %s: %d\n", > + sensor_info->name, err); Ditto. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko