Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-155505-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Message-ID: <b9d0e2fd-069c-439c-a85f-1e99bf9018c3@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 16:55:32 +0100
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] ASoC: qcom: common: add Display port Jack function
To: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
 alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20240422134354.89291-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
 <20240422134354.89291-3-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
 <ZiejT5yddioQ8upR@hovoldconsulting.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <ZiejT5yddioQ8upR@hovoldconsulting.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


On 23/04/2024 13:02, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 02:43:52PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>   
>>   static const struct snd_soc_dapm_widget qcom_jack_snd_widgets[] = {
>>   	SND_SOC_DAPM_HP("Headphone Jack", NULL),
>>   	SND_SOC_DAPM_MIC("Mic Jack", NULL),
>> +	SND_SOC_DAPM_SPK("HDMI/DP0 Jack", NULL),
>> +	SND_SOC_DAPM_SPK("HDMI/DP1 Jack", NULL),
>> +	SND_SOC_DAPM_SPK("HDMI/DP2 Jack", NULL),
> 
> Shouldn't these be split in dedicated HDMI and DP jacks too? What if you
> have a machine with HDMI and DP jacks which would otherwise both claim
> "HDMI/DP0"?

These map to the Jack's added as part of qcom_snd_dp_jack_setup and 
belong to DISPLAY_PORT_RX_0, DISPLAY_PORT_RX_1, DISPLAY_PORT_RX_2.

If its going via USB-C DP controller it will be either DP or an HDMI ?

This is the most common naming for the USB-C DP/HDMI jack events.

Qualcomm LPASS in some older SoCs had a dedicated HDMI interface which 
is different to this one.

Usual Other ways to connect HDMI is via external HDMI Bridge using I2S 
interface which totally different to this DP interface.

So none of these will conflict.


hope this clarifies.

thanks,
Srini
> 
> Johan