Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-155593-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:46:28 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>, workflows@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] Documentation: process: Recommend to put Cc: tags
 after cutter '---' line
Message-ID: <Zifl5PAAD1GTLWSK@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20240423132024.2368662-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <20240423132024.2368662-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <871q6wrw12.fsf@intel.com>
 <ZifHnw1cxgP77MKx@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <878r14yw8n.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <878r14yw8n.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 08:44:24AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> writes:
> 
> >> A lot of patches get sent with
> >> more Cc's in the mail message than in the commit message.
> >
> > Note, this is the recommendation as it's stated. You can continue polluting
> > the environment on your wish.
> 
> The environmental case here is ... not strong.
> 
> I, too, have my doubts about this recommendation; responding this way is
> not going to change a lot of minds, IMO.

Let's see how discussion will go.

Nevertheless, there seem no objections against the first patch in the series.
Can it be applied?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko