Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-156070-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 10:01:56 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Th=E9o?= Lebrun <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@ti.com>,
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@mobileye.com>,
	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@mobileye.com>,
	Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 0/9] spi: cadence-qspi: add Mobileye EyeQ5
 support
Message-ID: <ZihaBGwVRpI9hV0B@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
References: <20240410-cdns-qspi-mbly-v3-0-7b7053449cf7@bootlin.com>
 <171283699002.32012.7629247540689477794.b4-ty@kernel.org>
 <D0QT350IJHFH.36EXE1UT9QM10@bootlin.com>
 <ZidAefc0Ejrklopf@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
 <D0RF1AKWAEAE.44N64GHMV2ZY@bootlin.com>
 <3f891794-0083-4245-bad7-518b1c48bb7c@linaro.org>
 <D0RIXN4JG6ZA.4W4HN68M9U6I@bootlin.com>
 <20240423-epidemic-schedule-6fa9869b3e87@spud>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5NS8qMoZHyi2Ue3W"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240423-epidemic-schedule-6fa9869b3e87@spud>


--5NS8qMoZHyi2Ue3W
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 06:23:16PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 03:08:05PM +0200, Th=E9o Lebrun wrote:

> > Thanks for the pointer. I've created an issue over at b4 to see what
> > people think about this matter. Current behavior is not intuitive as a
> > young contributor.

> FWIW, given I see `having a more confident comment such as
> "(commit not applied)".` there, having (no commit info) doesn't mean
> that it wasn't applied always. Sometimes I've found that due to changes
> in the patch b4 could not detect that it was applied and reported (no
> commit info).

Right, it can't prove a negative - if it can't find the patch it could
be because it wasn't sent against current code and got changed
sufficiently in application to cause issues.

--5NS8qMoZHyi2Ue3W
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmYoWgEACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9C8nwf+M6jC46HsJsqNP1PRY9pjRMyT3AQW0H3wNNL8oUBBSvB3W2bj24C58F0u
t+PFR0xaEVPfXCWG2GrCaBc3AE4ZhvbcDc+sjMo/HhEBt8AK8/UkVRdSClyfFAnE
LIuSQaYoFdI+rDDkKBtpdSXRYESKR/vEokl2r1b5fW14JYz28Olnih/T6p9sn/YW
2k/2AxFZfPRFENAb04cl7VGEdn2AJVWAL7nfmB8YgNobZ5xzaAyV+I9uDKNdSops
5SnImX5KnHXy8sXU6HJMSgwCM+ebaK/1VAQfSESj2debilGRNychlThh5r9nZI3J
EG+up4J2xk+r2lkix2Zzu8/eaZN2Ug==
=l1gO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5NS8qMoZHyi2Ue3W--