Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 15:33:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 15:33:25 -0500 Received: from adsl-63-199-104-197.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.199.104.197]:62725 "HELO mail.theoesters.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 15:32:28 -0500 From: "Phil Oester" To: Subject: 1gb RAM + 1gb SWAP + make -j bzImage = OOM Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:32:27 -0800 Message-ID: <004b01c1955e$ecbc9190$6400a8c0@philxp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2.4.17, I can't make -j bzImage without OOM kicking in. Relatively light .config here - bzImage compiles to less than 1mb. Seems with 1 gb of RAM and swap, the box should be able to handle this (box is dual P3 600 btw). Is this unreasonable? How much RAM should it take to accomplish this??? -Phil Oester - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/