Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-156440-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 10:02:14 +0300
Message-Id: <D0S5S2NL1N5P.3Q0SM01VIZBJX@kernel.org>
Cc: =?utf-8?b?5YiY5Y+MKOi9qeWxuSk=?= <ls123674@antgroup.com>, "Chatre,
 Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] x86/sgx: Explicitly give up the CPU in EDMM's
 ioctl() to avoid softlockup
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: "Bojun Zhu" <zhubojun.zbj@antgroup.com>, "Huang, Kai"
 <kai.huang@intel.com>, "linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org"
 <linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org"
 <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "dave.hansen@linux.intel.com"
 <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
References: <20240423092550.59297-1-zhubojun.zbj@antgroup.com>
 <20240423092550.59297-2-zhubojun.zbj@antgroup.com>
 <02fe00c3b10e4476d500ad7a34024b7eae5e3c97.camel@intel.com>
 <85dfbebc-a2d5-4828-b3b9-f929cd6e30cf@antgroup.com>
In-Reply-To: <85dfbebc-a2d5-4828-b3b9-f929cd6e30cf@antgroup.com>

On Wed Apr 24, 2024 at 9:46 AM EEST, Bojun Zhu wrote:
> Based on the the discussion among you, Jarkko and Reinette,
> I will keep the need_resched() and wrap the logic in using sgx_resched(),
> as suggested by Jarkko.

Sounds like a plan :-)

> Regards,
>
> Bojun

BR, Jarkko