Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-156627-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Message-ID: <80e72876-da81-4694-86a2-835c049ed30f@yandex.ru>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 12:24:49 +0300
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: reorganize path_openat()
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
 "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
 Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
 Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
 Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
 "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20240422084505.3465238-1-stsp2@yandex.ru>
 <858f6fb6afcd450d85d1ff900f82d396@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: stsp <stsp2@yandex.ru>
In-Reply-To: <858f6fb6afcd450d85d1ff900f82d396@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

24.04.2024 12:17, David Laight пишет:
> From: Stas Sergeev
>> Sent: 22 April 2024 09:45
> I seem to have 5 copies of this patch.....

Yep, its re-sent with every new iteartion,
but doesn't change by itself (the other
one changes).
Is there anything I can do to avoid
unneeded duplicates of an unchanged
patch?
Manually reduce Cc list until the patch
changes? That looks too much of a trouble
though.

> You probably ought to merge the two 'unlikely' tests.

Ok.


> Copying op->open_flag to a local may also generate better code.

Can't gcc deduce this on its own?
But ok, will do.