Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-156837-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:08:23 +0200
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
 LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Gerald Schaefer
 <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>, Vasily
 Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] s390/pci: Drop unneeded reference to CONFIG_DMI
Message-ID: <20240424140823.55475951@endymion.delvare>
In-Reply-To: <Zij1fJw+Ksrq5iAm@li-008a6a4c-3549-11b2-a85c-c5cc2836eea2.ibm.com>
References: <20240423162724.3966265a@endymion.delvare>
	<b5ee24107efbc943cfc8ea59bf0653d2dd6325ad.camel@linux.ibm.com>
	<Zij1fJw+Ksrq5iAm@li-008a6a4c-3549-11b2-a85c-c5cc2836eea2.ibm.com>
Organization: SUSE Linux
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:05:49 +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 01:34:49PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > I'm assuming this change should go via the s390 tree? So let me add the
> > s390x architecture maintainers to pick this up, but from my side and
> > considering that you maintain the SMBIOS/DMI support:  
> 
> Hi Jean,
> 
> Whether this patch is good to go alone via s390 tree or (as Niklas
> indicated) might depend on some SMBIOS/DMI update?


It's good to go through the s390 tree, it's a simple clean-up which
doesn't depend on anything else.

> > Acked-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>  

Thanks to both of you!

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support