Received: by 2002:a89:48b:0:b0:1f5:f2ab:c469 with SMTP id a11csp409272lqd; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 06:17:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCVp8fICAoJoxhwQNQKUqo/q1zoPuLZ50yhleRXQMsIC3oK9Wsl2P1G/i6wu+kZv+y0SjtnYZv3WLLLInPcoQ5RAgURDy4LiFOdFxbuLqw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEQ5pg+pRunO8Yyp4CAhPd0bfI9uhrs4cxgVHkhaT5dR/5d0tCx/FZPrX/HybV9ZwHMTtYy X-Received: by 2002:a67:bb15:0:b0:47b:ce8f:fb9 with SMTP id m21-20020a67bb15000000b0047bce8f0fb9mr2334053vsn.33.1713964674796; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 06:17:54 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s8-20020a67f4c8000000b0047bab8151eesi2224001vsn.222.2024.04.24.06.17.54 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 24 Apr 2024 06:17:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-156942-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.s=mail header.b=iixRuVMH; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-156942-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-156942-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org" Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 729AD1C2133C for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 13:17:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8914115B973; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 13:17:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b="iixRuVMH" Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com (perceval.ideasonboard.com [213.167.242.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 102392AEFB; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 13:17:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.167.242.64 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713964665; cv=none; b=PegVfbd9JfIcsHmdCz0g028IuW303tgF7DXt/QS4yPSdWlqyytBWetYAE+wk5iJUp9O551C09sMh1kNJUfRnopLCD8UhK6TswUZGpjKDGQK2vPKhfYQMOVIuqVGBbvb93IXzwwA12GbCPfyQC0vD7r2APlOy/nD2nsuoNuie7bs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713964665; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+KR1rPOGcIAcruvi5HWI5QPwNFOz4Ekj6J4zg+s3rBU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=cbTzZS22dpMUFIpJAUgxvMwZdVIYyfgvq10sUN2+jjcbqaA9GwCBp8RmYQigDaGssWerltScl25dBygTKrT14TRsT6bQxwGuXNNnmeIHkpRp/eWJ12S7+rBXwBzcwwPSv2txxDIU2c7WC+y+s91LuHtoVja6RuhxvHUsYItApN4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ideasonboard.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ideasonboard.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b=iixRuVMH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.167.242.64 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ideasonboard.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ideasonboard.com Received: from pendragon.ideasonboard.com (117.145-247-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [81.247.145.117]) by perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22280B1; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 15:16:48 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com; s=mail; t=1713964608; bh=+KR1rPOGcIAcruvi5HWI5QPwNFOz4Ekj6J4zg+s3rBU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=iixRuVMHTGMMpnmJiPJUpFUDPGPn9+8hBEbOgsqCH3r5syJx+XhqGJt6oYg+hshHN V7RqHq7VX4iZXKBjK0IYa66oEdMVcIp2N0VjTUu+u0ltAlRcMrULHLKsWCn0s+OpcY aiNGxT/K5x0iL+saZd3m/CLbqcGhjRo89NpgNWXo= Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 16:17:33 +0300 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Tomi Valkeinen Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Hans Verkuil , Sakari Ailus , Umang Jain , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/10] media: subdev: Support single-stream case in v4l2_subdev_enable/disable_streams() Message-ID: <20240424131733.GH18608@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> References: <20240416-enable-streams-impro-v5-0-bd5fcea49388@ideasonboard.com> <20240416-enable-streams-impro-v5-9-bd5fcea49388@ideasonboard.com> <20240419153603.GE12651@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <7ed5e8cf-2bcc-4d4c-a1dc-17592b5909c0@ideasonboard.com> <20240424130922.GG18608@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <6e2eeba1-236f-481e-9e35-460f26549698@ideasonboard.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6e2eeba1-236f-481e-9e35-460f26549698@ideasonboard.com> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 04:11:36PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 24/04/2024 16:09, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 04:05:31PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > >> On 19/04/2024 18:36, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 04:55:12PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > >>>> At the moment the v4l2_subdev_enable/disable_streams() functions call > >>>> fallback helpers to handle the case where the subdev only implements > >>>> .s_stream(), and the main function handles the case where the subdev > >>>> implements streams (V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_STREAMS, which implies > >>>> .enable/disable_streams()). > >>>> > >>>> What is missing is support for subdevs which do not implement streams > >>>> support, but do implement .enable/disable_streams(). Example cases of > >>>> these subdevices are single-stream cameras, where using > >>>> .enable/disable_streams() is not required but helps us remove the users > >>>> of the legacy .s_stream(), and subdevices with multiple source pads (but > >>>> single stream per pad), where .enable/disable_streams() allows the > >>>> subdevice to control the enable/disable state per pad. > >>>> > >>>> The two single-streams cases (.s_stream() and .enable/disable_streams()) > >>>> are very similar, and with small changes we can change the > >>>> v4l2_subdev_enable/disable_streams() functions to support all three > >>>> cases, without needing separate fallback functions. > >>>> > >>>> A few potentially problematic details, though: > >>>> > >>>> - For the single-streams cases we use sd->enabled_pads field, which > >>>> limits the number of pads for the subdevice to 64. For simplicity I > >>>> added the check for this limitation to the beginning of the function, > >>>> and it also applies to the streams case. > >>>> > >>>> - The fallback functions only allowed the target pad to be a source pad. > >>>> It is not very clear to me why this check was needed, but it was not > >>>> needed in the streams case. However, I doubt the > >>>> v4l2_subdev_enable/disable_streams() code has ever been tested with > >>>> sink pads, so to be on the safe side, I added the same check > >>>> to the v4l2_subdev_enable/disable_streams() functions. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Now that v4l2_subdev_enable_streams() is usable by (almost) every > >>> driver, should we update documentation to indicate that manual calls to > >>> .s_stream() should be avoided ? > >> > >> How about: > >> > >> diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h b/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h > >> index dabe1b5dfe4a..f52bb790773c 100644 > >> --- a/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h > >> +++ b/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h > >> @@ -450,6 +450,11 @@ enum v4l2_subdev_pre_streamon_flags { > >> * already started or stopped subdev. Also see call_s_stream wrapper in > >> * v4l2-subdev.c. > >> * > >> + * New drivers should instead implement &v4l2_subdev_pad_ops.enable_streams > >> + * and &v4l2_subdev_pad_ops.disable_streams operations, and use > >> + * v4l2_subdev_s_stream_helper for the &v4l2_subdev_video_ops.s_stream > >> + * operation to support legacy users.A > >> + * > > > > Add > > > > * Drivers should also not call the .s_stream() subdev operation directly, > > * but use the v4l2_subdev_enable_streams() and > > * v4l2_subdev_disable_streams() helpers. > > > >> * @g_pixelaspect: callback to return the pixelaspect ratio. > >> * > >> * @s_dv_timings: Set custom dv timings in the sub device. This is used > >> > >> > >> Although now that I think about it, can we "ever" get rid of s_stream? > >> enable_streams is only usable if the subdev has pads. > > > > Do we have pad-less subdevs that can stream ? > > Probably not, but isn't s_stream used to enable any type of subdev? Or > is there a different op to power on padless subdevs? s_stream() is supposed to start/stop streaming, and you can't really have streams without pads, as they have to come from/go somewhere. > >> If that's the > >> case, the text above should probably clarify when one should continue > >> using s_stream. > >> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen > >>>> --- > >>>> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c | 187 ++++++++++++++-------------------- > >>>> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-) > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c > >>>> index e45fd42da1e3..10406acfb9d0 100644 > >>>> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c > >>>> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c > >>>> @@ -2106,6 +2106,13 @@ static void v4l2_subdev_collect_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, > >>>> u64 *found_streams, > >>>> u64 *enabled_streams) > >>>> { > >>>> + if (!(sd->flags & V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_STREAMS)) { > >>>> + *found_streams = BIT_ULL(0); > >>>> + *enabled_streams = > >>>> + (sd->enabled_pads & BIT_ULL(pad)) ? BIT_ULL(0) : 0; > >>>> + return; > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> *found_streams = 0; > >>>> *enabled_streams = 0; > >>>> > >>>> @@ -2127,6 +2134,14 @@ static void v4l2_subdev_set_streams_enabled(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, > >>>> u32 pad, u64 streams_mask, > >>>> bool enabled) > >>>> { > >>>> + if (!(sd->flags & V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_STREAMS)) { > >>>> + if (enabled) > >>>> + sd->enabled_pads |= BIT_ULL(pad); > >>>> + else > >>>> + sd->enabled_pads &= ~BIT_ULL(pad); > >>>> + return; > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> for (unsigned int i = 0; i < state->stream_configs.num_configs; ++i) { > >>>> struct v4l2_subdev_stream_config *cfg = > >>>> &state->stream_configs.configs[i]; > >>>> @@ -2136,51 +2151,6 @@ static void v4l2_subdev_set_streams_enabled(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, > >>>> } > >>>> } > >>>> > >>>> -static int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams_fallback(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad, > >>>> - u64 streams_mask) > >>>> -{ > >>>> - struct device *dev = sd->entity.graph_obj.mdev->dev; > >>>> - int ret; > >>>> - > >>>> - /* > >>>> - * The subdev doesn't implement pad-based stream enable, fall back > >>>> - * to the .s_stream() operation. > >>>> - */ > >>>> - if (!(sd->entity.pads[pad].flags & MEDIA_PAD_FL_SOURCE)) > >>>> - return -EOPNOTSUPP; > >>>> - > >>>> - /* > >>>> - * .s_stream() means there is no streams support, so the only allowed > >>>> - * stream is the implicit stream 0. > >>>> - */ > >>>> - if (streams_mask != BIT_ULL(0)) > >>>> - return -EOPNOTSUPP; > >>>> - > >>>> - /* > >>>> - * We use a 64-bit bitmask for tracking enabled pads, so only subdevices > >>>> - * with 64 pads or less can be supported. > >>>> - */ > >>>> - if (pad >= sizeof(sd->enabled_pads) * BITS_PER_BYTE) > >>>> - return -EOPNOTSUPP; > >>>> - > >>>> - if (sd->enabled_pads & BIT_ULL(pad)) { > >>>> - dev_dbg(dev, "pad %u already enabled on %s\n", > >>>> - pad, sd->entity.name); > >>>> - return -EALREADY; > >>>> - } > >>>> - > >>>> - /* Start streaming when the first pad is enabled. */ > >>>> - if (!sd->enabled_pads) { > >>>> - ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, video, s_stream, 1); > >>>> - if (ret) > >>>> - return ret; > >>>> - } > >>>> - > >>>> - sd->enabled_pads |= BIT_ULL(pad); > >>>> - > >>>> - return 0; > >>>> -} > >>>> - > >>>> int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad, > >>>> u64 streams_mask) > >>>> { > >>>> @@ -2189,21 +2159,33 @@ int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad, > >>>> bool already_streaming; > >>>> u64 enabled_streams; > >>>> u64 found_streams; > >>>> + bool use_s_stream; > >>>> int ret; > >>>> > >>>> /* A few basic sanity checks first. */ > >>>> if (pad >= sd->entity.num_pads) > >>>> return -EINVAL; > >>>> > >>>> + if (!(sd->entity.pads[pad].flags & MEDIA_PAD_FL_SOURCE)) > >>>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > >>>> + > >>>> + /* > >>>> + * We use a 64-bit bitmask for tracking enabled pads, so only subdevices > >>>> + * with 64 pads or less can be supported. > >>>> + */ > >>>> + if (pad >= sizeof(sd->enabled_pads) * BITS_PER_BYTE) > >>>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > >>>> + > >>>> if (!streams_mask) > >>>> return 0; > >>>> > >>>> /* Fallback on .s_stream() if .enable_streams() isn't available. */ > >>>> - if (!v4l2_subdev_has_op(sd, pad, enable_streams)) > >>>> - return v4l2_subdev_enable_streams_fallback(sd, pad, > >>>> - streams_mask); > >>>> + use_s_stream = !v4l2_subdev_has_op(sd, pad, enable_streams); > >>>> > >>>> - state = v4l2_subdev_lock_and_get_active_state(sd); > >>>> + if (!use_s_stream) > >>>> + state = v4l2_subdev_lock_and_get_active_state(sd); > >>>> + else > >>>> + state = NULL; > >>>> > >>>> /* > >>>> * Verify that the requested streams exist and that they are not > >>>> @@ -2231,9 +2213,18 @@ int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad, > >>>> > >>>> already_streaming = v4l2_subdev_is_streaming(sd); > >>>> > >>>> - /* Call the .enable_streams() operation. */ > >>>> - ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, pad, enable_streams, state, pad, > >>>> - streams_mask); > >>>> + if (!use_s_stream) { > >>>> + /* Call the .enable_streams() operation. */ > >>>> + ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, pad, enable_streams, state, pad, > >>>> + streams_mask); > >>>> + } else { > >>>> + /* Start streaming when the first pad is enabled. */ > >>>> + if (!already_streaming) > >>>> + ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, video, s_stream, 1); > >>>> + else > >>>> + ret = 0; > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> if (ret) { > >>>> dev_dbg(dev, "enable streams %u:%#llx failed: %d\n", pad, > >>>> streams_mask, ret); > >>>> @@ -2243,34 +2234,32 @@ int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad, > >>>> /* Mark the streams as enabled. */ > >>>> v4l2_subdev_set_streams_enabled(sd, state, pad, streams_mask, true); > >>> > >>> state gets set to a non-null value above if the subdev has an > >>> enable_streams operation, while in v4l2_subdev_set_streams_enabled(), > >> > >> That's not quite true, v4l2_subdev_lock_and_get_active_state() returns > >> NULL if there's no state. If the driver has .enable_streams but no > >> subdev-state, we'll have NULL state. But is that a driver bug? Probably, > >> although I'm not quite sure. Whereas V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_STREAMS without > >> state is a driver bug. > >> > >>> you use it if the V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_STREAMS flag is set. The second > >>> condition is a subset of the first one, so it should be safe now, but I > >>> wonder if we're at risk of crashes in the future when reworking the > >>> code. I'm probably worrying needlessly. > >> > >> I agree that this is a bit messy. We have multiple different scenarios > >> which we handle in the same functions, and it's somewhat unclear what > >> op/state/flag combinations the drivers are allowed to have and what not. > >> > >> I could add a !state check here, and then use sd->enabled_pads. But that > >> doesn't feel correct, and I think it's just better to crash and then fix > >> it if we end up there. > >> > >>>> > >>>> - if (!already_streaming) > >>>> + if (!use_s_stream && !already_streaming) > >>>> v4l2_subdev_enable_privacy_led(sd); > >>> > >>> Once everybody switches to v4l2_subdev_enable_streams() (am I dreaming?) > >>> we should move LED handling from the .s_stream() wrapper to here for the > >>> fallback case too. How about a TODO comment ? > >> > >> Let's get back to this after we figure out if s_stream can ever be removed. > >> > >>>> > >>>> done: > >>>> - v4l2_subdev_unlock_state(state); > >>>> + if (!use_s_stream) > >>> > >>> if (state) > >>> > >>> would be better I think. > >> > >> We get the state and state lock if (!use_s_stream), so I think it makes > >> sense to use the same condition when unlocking to be symmetric. I'm sure > >> I can be convinced to use if (state) too, though =). > >> > >>>> + v4l2_subdev_unlock_state(state); > >>>> > >>>> return ret; > >>>> } > >>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(v4l2_subdev_enable_streams); > >>>> > >>>> -static int v4l2_subdev_disable_streams_fallback(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad, > >>>> - u64 streams_mask) > >>>> +int v4l2_subdev_disable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad, > >>>> + u64 streams_mask) > >>>> { > >>>> struct device *dev = sd->entity.graph_obj.mdev->dev; > >>>> + struct v4l2_subdev_state *state; > >>>> + u64 enabled_streams; > >>>> + u64 found_streams; > >>>> + bool use_s_stream; > >>>> int ret; > >>>> > >>>> - /* > >>>> - * If the subdev doesn't implement pad-based stream enable, fall back > >>>> - * to the .s_stream() operation. > >>>> - */ > >>>> - if (!(sd->entity.pads[pad].flags & MEDIA_PAD_FL_SOURCE)) > >>>> - return -EOPNOTSUPP; > >>>> + /* A few basic sanity checks first. */ > >>>> + if (pad >= sd->entity.num_pads) > >>>> + return -EINVAL; > >>>> > >>>> - /* > >>>> - * .s_stream() means there is no streams support, so the only allowed > >>>> - * stream is the implicit stream 0. > >>>> - */ > >>>> - if (streams_mask != BIT_ULL(0)) > >>>> + if (!(sd->entity.pads[pad].flags & MEDIA_PAD_FL_SOURCE)) > >>>> return -EOPNOTSUPP; > >>>> > >>>> /* > >>>> @@ -2280,46 +2269,16 @@ static int v4l2_subdev_disable_streams_fallback(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad, > >>>> if (pad >= sizeof(sd->enabled_pads) * BITS_PER_BYTE) > >>>> return -EOPNOTSUPP; > >>>> > >>>> - if (!(sd->enabled_pads & BIT_ULL(pad))) { > >>>> - dev_dbg(dev, "pad %u already disabled on %s\n", > >>>> - pad, sd->entity.name); > >>>> - return -EALREADY; > >>>> - } > >>>> - > >>>> - /* Stop streaming when the last streams are disabled. */ > >>>> - if (!(sd->enabled_pads & ~BIT_ULL(pad))) { > >>>> - ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, video, s_stream, 0); > >>>> - if (ret) > >>>> - return ret; > >>>> - } > >>>> - > >>>> - sd->enabled_pads &= ~BIT_ULL(pad); > >>>> - > >>>> - return 0; > >>>> -} > >>>> - > >>>> -int v4l2_subdev_disable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad, > >>>> - u64 streams_mask) > >>>> -{ > >>>> - struct device *dev = sd->entity.graph_obj.mdev->dev; > >>>> - struct v4l2_subdev_state *state; > >>>> - u64 enabled_streams; > >>>> - u64 found_streams; > >>>> - int ret; > >>>> - > >>>> - /* A few basic sanity checks first. */ > >>>> - if (pad >= sd->entity.num_pads) > >>>> - return -EINVAL; > >>>> - > >>>> if (!streams_mask) > >>>> return 0; > >>>> > >>>> /* Fallback on .s_stream() if .disable_streams() isn't available. */ > >>>> - if (!v4l2_subdev_has_op(sd, pad, disable_streams)) > >>>> - return v4l2_subdev_disable_streams_fallback(sd, pad, > >>>> - streams_mask); > >>>> + use_s_stream = !v4l2_subdev_has_op(sd, pad, disable_streams); > >>>> > >>>> - state = v4l2_subdev_lock_and_get_active_state(sd); > >>>> + if (!use_s_stream) > >>>> + state = v4l2_subdev_lock_and_get_active_state(sd); > >>>> + else > >>>> + state = NULL; > >>>> > >>>> /* > >>>> * Verify that the requested streams exist and that they are not > >>>> @@ -2345,9 +2304,19 @@ int v4l2_subdev_disable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad, > >>>> > >>>> dev_dbg(dev, "disable streams %u:%#llx\n", pad, streams_mask); > >>>> > >>>> - /* Call the .disable_streams() operation. */ > >>>> - ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, pad, disable_streams, state, pad, > >>>> - streams_mask); > >>>> + if (!use_s_stream) { > >>>> + /* Call the .disable_streams() operation. */ > >>>> + ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, pad, disable_streams, state, pad, > >>>> + streams_mask); > >>>> + } else { > >>>> + /* Stop streaming when the last streams are disabled. */ > >>>> + > >>>> + if (!(sd->enabled_pads & ~BIT_ULL(pad))) > >>>> + ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, video, s_stream, 0); > >>>> + else > >>>> + ret = 0; > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> if (ret) { > >>>> dev_dbg(dev, "disable streams %u:%#llx failed: %d\n", pad, > >>>> streams_mask, ret); > >>>> @@ -2357,10 +2326,12 @@ int v4l2_subdev_disable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad, > >>>> v4l2_subdev_set_streams_enabled(sd, state, pad, streams_mask, false); > >>>> > >>>> done: > >>>> - if (!v4l2_subdev_is_streaming(sd)) > >>>> - v4l2_subdev_disable_privacy_led(sd); > >>>> + if (!use_s_stream) { > >>>> + if (!v4l2_subdev_is_streaming(sd)) > >>>> + v4l2_subdev_disable_privacy_led(sd); > >>> > >>> Do we want to disable the privacy LED on failure in all cases, in > >>> particular when the .s_stream() or .disable_streams() operations are not > >>> even called ? > >>> > >>> And now that I wrote that, I realize the !v4l2_subdev_is_streaming() > >>> condition will not be true if the operations failed, so it should be > >>> fine. > >>> > >>> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > >>> > >>>> > >>>> - v4l2_subdev_unlock_state(state); > >>>> + v4l2_subdev_unlock_state(state); > >>>> + } > >>>> > >>>> return ret; > >>>> } > >>>> -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart