Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-157131-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 17:52:03 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Cc: Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@linux.dev>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] software node: Implement device_get_match_data fwnode
 callback
Message-ID: <Zikck2FJb4-PgXX0@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20240422164658.217037-1-sui.jingfeng@linux.dev>
 <Zie3ebHOEpWHj1qV@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <d5bc1e73-a553-451e-ab74-f5f0ca259c6b@linux.dev>
 <hcltp2bbxxg2t7ibmzgiib7mgbwgmvzwnnq6mochdh7c4h76r3@bxj6yk5zq64e>
 <ZikE4qOVO7rgIs9a@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <CAA8EJpr1FSjizAh6Dp5Bmux3NrGYh=BfHFL4D1fa87Og4ymY0w@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAA8EJpr1FSjizAh6Dp5Bmux3NrGYh=BfHFL4D1fa87Og4ymY0w@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 04:34:39PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 16:11, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 12:37:16AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 12:49:18AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> > > > On 2024/4/23 21:28, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 12:46:58AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:

..

> > > But let me throw an argument why this patch (or something similar) looks
> > > to be necessary.
> > >
> > > Both on DT and non-DT systems the kernel allows using the non-OF based
> > > matching. For the platform devices there is platform_device_id-based
> > > matching.
> > >
> > > Currently handling the data coming from such device_ids requires using
> > > special bits of code, e.g. platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data to
> > > get the data from the platform_device_id. Having such codepaths goes
> > > against the goal of unifying DT and non-DT paths via generic property /
> > > fwnode code.
> > >
> > > As such, I support Sui's idea of being able to use device_get_match_data
> > > for non-DT, non-ACPI platform devices.
> >
> > I'm not sure I buy this. We have a special helpers based on the bus type to
> > combine device_get_match_data() with the respective ID table crawling, see
> > the SPI and I?C cases as the examples.
> 
> I was thinking that we might be able to deprecate these helpers and
> always use device_get_match_data().

True, but that is orthogonal to swnode match_data support, right?
There even was (still is?) a patch series to do something like a new
member to struct device_driver (? don't remember) to achieve that.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko